Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[NETIKS]

 NickZ
For Your Information SUN IS LOSING MASS to give ENERGY! FUSING THE MATTER!
So Its MASS to ENERGY Conversion On the Sun!
THE SUN IS LOSING MASS TO GIVE ENERGY!

[verpies]

Then how to get it to work practically?

Perhaps the same was as Grumage.

Wesley my dear friend has not proven anything, yet. Only talks of revolution, saving the world, etc...  Isn't this a little before the fact?  Or, is he also holding out??? He says he's going to tell all, and hold back nothing. I hope so... I know we all do.

Wesley has proven that nuclear decay can be induced artificially.
As far as I know he is not holding out - he is waiting for new Colman tubes.

[NickZ]

    quote:
   "Wesley has proven that nuclear decay can be induced artificially".

   How has he proven this? He has not shown an output, from his device. Even a tiny one.
Even a Cfl gives off radiation, so do cell phones, Tv, microwaves ovens, etz.. so what? This does not lead to an electrical output, per se.

  I will be patient, as always, but mark my words, there will be no electrical output from beta decay. If I am wrong, I will be the first to acknowledge it.
Do you really think that the best of the worlds scientist and the best labs know about this, but aren't doing anything about it.  They could be make billions, but no, they aren't.

  We can say that "Sun light comes from the Sun", but it does not. Again, mark my words.
  We can attribute this so called beta decay to whats producing an output. But, that may not really be the cause of this output, but a consequence of it, instead.
We must look at the cause of causes.
Who has lived for 70 years to test the continual output of an Edison battery?
  I'm not trying to be negative about this, even though it may sound like it, I'm trying to be real. The proof is in the pudding.
   I suspect that you Verpies are correct, that the waiting for his chemicals will not give any better expected results.
  I have nothing but time. so... My best to Wesley, I am on his side, as well.
Team effort...  We don't all need to agree, in any case. We just need to get somewhere with all this.

[NickZ]

  Netiks:
  And for your information: Where do you think that the mass that the sun is supposed to giving off came from in the first place. Big Bang???  Again, from nowhere, in a second...
  Who has mentioned that Light has mass?  Does a spark have mass?

[stivep]

to Verpies and others:



I got to certain assumption today but I must  put all of it  together to have clear picture


It strike me that high voltage with small radioactive component(* source)
near  vicinity of say coil capacitor
where source  is on negative charged   plate
attracts - influenced Alpha particles and these are   very  heavy and very very energetic
Whats more alpha is not harmful as much ...could be stopped by skin or paper.


that avalanche is loud and pretty much spectacular.
What is more.
The source of radioactivity does not have to be alpha source.


could be beta  or gamma
but reaction is seen only on plates especially if we take  capacitor that has insulation medium -  air

What puzzle me is  shiny object inside of coil  capacitor of TK right in the middle ( aquarium)
I could see in there  Colman glass tube or any other  possibly radioactive source.
I ask few times  if someone has the picture of it.
It  was definitely posted here on this forum   long time ago  but I could not find it.

Alpha particles[/font] have a typical kinetic energy of 5 MeV (that is, ≈ 0.13% of their total energy, i.e. 110 TJ/kg) and a speed of 15,000 km/s. This corresponds to a speed of around 0.05 c. There is surprisingly small variation around this energy, due to the heavy dependence of the half-life of this process on the energy produced (see equations in the Geiger–Nuttall law[/font]).

Wesley