Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

Started by Pirate88179, June 27, 2009, 04:41:28 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 81 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hoppy

Quote from: verpies on May 02, 2013, 08:13:57 AM
Yes, because I heard overloaded transformers make transient noises like that before and I don't know of any other components, that're visible on that video, that can make noises like that.

Thanks for your reply. I asked this question as I can't see how the transformer is getting overloaded having traced the circuit out as far as I can. I'm now wondering if there was an inverter feeding the transformer from the same battery powering the oscillator - hum, food for thought and maybe experiment.

sparks

Quote from: verpies on May 02, 2013, 07:49:29 AM
Yes, Auger electrons can be knocked out of atoms but their energy will not be higher than the absorbed photon energy (X-Ray), that caused it, thus no energy gain.
Perhaps a photon can get all the way to the nucleus and convert a neutron to proton (a mass conversion), causing the release of nuclear binding energy, yielding an actual gain.
According to the Reiss Howard paper and patent - even lower energy RF photons can affect nuclei that way.

Those XRF analyzers are really good at determining the isotopic contents of elements heavier than Carbon.

    Can't a photon be blue shifted by matter.   I forget the name some type of scattering which is quite the opposite of flurescense.  And from whence did this energy gain come from?  Is there any chance that electrons have actual orbital momentum a form of inertia which when altered generates photons?
Think Legacy
A spark gap is cold cold cold
Space is a hot hot liquid
Spread the Love

slapper

thank you stivep:

wikipedia/cobalt, under characteristics, in the second paragraph:
QuoteThe metal reacts with F2 at 520 K to give CoF3, with Cl2, Br2 and I2, the corresponding binary halides were formed. It has no reaction with H2 and N2 even when heated, but it does react with boron, carbon, phosphorus, arsenic and sulphur.[10]

haven't had a chance to view the referenced material so i'm not sure what they mean by 'does react with'.

but it looks like we could have an active state without adding any energy with just the phosphorus in the mix. i recall that there is some carbon in the mix as well?
so i'm curious if you've ever observed any hint of some spontaneous energy levels.

if this is the case the magnetic break is more of a necessity than an option. we'll want each active element to be placed between magnetic poles with the break normally on as opposed to normally off.
what type of electromagnet, or permanent magnet assembly would be best for this application.

i guess i can understand the role cadmium plays as it absorbs gamma; if that is what it does.

it's a real mind twister, for me, to visualize the fields developed in and around the tube. the copper and zinc would seem to produce different fields; one static and the other magnetic.
so can we say the copper/zinc not only help in passing energy through the mix, but also serve to polarize the direction of the particles that get released/emitted.

it will help to know so that we can aim to capture this energy in the most efficient way. i'm thinking washers slipped around the tube, at each copper/zinc junction that encloses the mix.

just posting out loud. i still haven't got around to playing with some barium titanate chunks i got in, like, over a month ago.

thanks for all the good posts guys.

take care.

nap.
we are not alone :)

Grumage

Quote from: Hoppy on May 01, 2013, 06:04:38 PM
Grum,

thanks for your update.

The Royer oscillator shown replacing the two transistor flip-flop in post 17297 is driving a flyback which in turn drives the spark gap but I don't think this is a TV type flyback coil and probably more powerful.

When powering your setup with a bench supply and getting a bright lamp, is the circuit as shown on the schematic or have you connected the other ground to the L3 leg to T1?

I'll do some experimentation with a Royer osc on the front-end.

Good evening Hoppy.

Yes I do have one ground connection at L3 / T1.

Moving on, I have now fully isolated the primary 3 turn coil because I think that is where  the gain was coming from. But things just seem to get more weird. I have today made a new coil for L4 being wound with 22 SWG at 10.5 ft. ie 1/4 the length of L3 on a 25mm dia PVC tube former. The 0.5 mFD is made up from two 1mFD MWO caps in series. I left a tail on the tube so I could move it freely up and down the main coils length. With a fixed ground on afore mentioned spot. I noted that you could light the bulb (40W) by touching a second ground to...... Aluminium tube within L2 L3. Cases of MWO caps. Even weirder, touching my soldering iron on one cap case and second ground to the other cap case, brilliant lit bulb, but fully overloading my Bench PSU which is rated at 5A!!

I just don't understand any of it!! I think I should go back to making IC engines, at least I know how they work!! :)

To all that have built a replication of post 17297. Just keep at it!

Cheers Grum.


Hoppy

Quote from: Grumage on May 02, 2013, 01:02:15 PM
Good evening Hoppy.

Yes I do have one ground connection at L3 / T1.

Moving on, I have now fully isolated the primary 3 turn coil because I think that is where  the gain was coming from. But things just seem to get more weird. I have today made a new coil for L4 being wound with 22 SWG at 10.5 ft. ie 1/4 the length of L3 on a 25mm dia PVC tube former. The 0.5 mFD is made up from two 1mFD MWO caps in series. I left a tail on the tube so I could move it freely up and down the main coils length. With a fixed ground on afore mentioned spot. I noted that you could light the bulb (40W) by touching a second ground to...... Aluminium tube within L2 L3. Cases of MWO caps. Even weirder, touching my soldering iron on one cap case and second ground to the other cap case, brilliant lit bulb, but fully overloading my Bench PSU which is rated at 5A!!

I just don't understand any of it!! I think I should go back to making IC engines, at least I know how they work!! :)

To all that have built a replication of post 17297. Just keep at it!

Cheers Grum.

Evening Grum,

Some soldering irons have their metal work earthed, so it sounds like this is the cause of the problem. I always use a battery for FE experiments. I've got excited a few times when using a bench PSU!