Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[stivep]

Copy of my post in  energetic forum:
original link:
http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/13901-colman-beta-decay-new-energy-source.html#post230379

es be aware of the radioactivity. What level of dose does this thing put out and how/can it be shielded. But I don't think that should scare people tooo much as long as precautions are taken. Lets not forget the radiation we are exposed to on a daily basis from cell phones etc. I recently stripped a rear projection television and the thing had a plastic/lead shield behind the viewing screen to block the X-rays put out by the CRTs. I personally don't think we should be scared of this thing, just be aware.
Jeff

Quote:Do you think you have the correct phosphorus??
Thank you for doing this..most of us dont have the fancy gear for monitoring radiation
You can find out what the tube emits and then determine shielding.
What is the wall thickness on the glass tubes you are using? Seems like we want to get thicker glass to replicate this since the tubes seem to be so easy to break

THERE IS NO NEED FOR ANYTHING SPECIAL WATCH VIDEO


software is free.


Understanding Spectroscopy is of help as it gives not only information about compound but transmutation prove after initial testing.another prove of activation and impact nature made by radio waves.


Radioactive Sample Analysis - Gamma Spectroscopy
Radioactive Sample Analysis - Gamma Spectroscopy - YouTube




some more info:
1.As NYW group progress( Aidas Arunas/T-1000 Wesley/stivep)



Thanks to Aidas there is a lot of progress in NMR/transmutation of Yoke.would not that be without the biggest brain in this- Arunas.
He is marvelously brilliant thinker.
As information are preliminary there is time needed for details.
Suffice it to say is that while
I'm working on Colman they are working on yoke but not yoke as one - yoke as effect in ferrite.And they got into revelation.
In the essence we all working on the same NMR/Transmutation
I'm just afraid to say number( power) to do not look silly but I'm in big WOW.


=============================================


2.Conformation by member of Russian Academy of Science to Andrea Rossi cold fusion.
О демонсÑ,рации ядерныÑ... процессов для альÑ,ернаÑ,ивной энергеÑ,ики. XLII Зигелевские ЧÑ,ения 23.03.13 - YouTube


It is important to remember that I state that Andrea Rossi is "most likely" using thermal phenomenon associated with Colman patent 1956Why is that important.



If it is proven than Patent rights of Rossi might be in jeopardy of being revoked.


The secret of Rossi is in secret additive "looks like" that is similar if not identical in nature to Colman.


Additional benefit is that device than "might" be so simple to build comparing with Rossi to take approx 2 hours to assemble if components are handy.


=============================================



3.Perpetual Motion Test Could Amend Theory of Timeby: Natalie WolchoverPerpetual Motion Test Could Amend Theory of Time



https://simonsfoundation.org/feature...heory-of-time/
read comments below the article.
Space-time crystal
Space-time crystal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Time Crystals' Could Upend Physicists' Theory of Time
'Time Crystals' Could Upend Physicists' Theory of Time | Wired Science | Wired.com
the same article but read the comments at the end.[
Death-defying time crystal could outlast the universe
]Death-defying time crystal could outlast the universe « Forums


Quantum Time Crystals Difficulties around the idea of spontaneous breaking of time translation symmetry in a closed quantum mechanical system are identified, and then overcome in a simple model. The possibility of ordering in imaginary time is also discussed
[1202.2539v2] Quantum Time Crystals
Physics - Crystals of Time
Researchers propose how to realize time crystals, structures whose lowest-energy states are periodic both in time and space




Update as of 5/3/2013 time 21:32
Video

Video & Audio: Frank Wilczek. Time Crystals - Metadata


Wesley

[sparks]

It can be in Anti-Stoke's Scattering.  It maintains thermal equilibrium, though.
From heat.
Unfortunately, The opposite happens with Stoke's Scattering.
Only if you believe that electrons actually orbit the nucleus like little balls.

  I believe they exist more like little space hurricanes.  This angular momentum determines up and down spin parameters as well as magnetic field polarization.  The virtual particles that create charge comprise the stuff that is spinning in the hurricane.   As an atom moves  (thermal energy)  these little space hurricanes move with it.   Various scientists still maintain that electrons can be modeled as little balls with orbital momentum.  The velocity of these little balls is the equivalent of 1 milliampere per electron.  So each mole of hydrogen atoms has the electrical potential energy equivalent of 6 to the 2oth power amperes when converted from atoms to plasma.  The plasma current is simply the little balls kinetic energy going macroscopic.  Or electron binding energy conversion.  Scientists are quick to calculate neuclear binding energy conversion but somehow overlook electron binding energy conversion.   The neuclear binding energy is of course many orders more than the electron binding energy but isolating neutrons and accelerating them into atomic cores to pop out another neutron is tricky and a highly regulated activity.  I still believe what Tesla was magnifying in his magnifying transmitter is what was happening in his air ionizing things called spark gaps.  Say you just pickup a current with a velocity when distributed into a resistance results in a 1/2 watt electron cascade event per cycle.  The cycle is repeated billions of times per second.  The power is quite interesting.  This device is then set to magnification which lowers it's intensity but effects a greater field.  So what was Tesla magnifying?

[verpies]

I believe they exist more like little space hurricanes.

That might be closer to the truth than point charges.
IMO they temporal rotations, but let's not get distracted by esoterica.

Various scientists still maintain that electrons can be modeled as little balls with orbital momentum.

Don't forget about the non-orbital angular momentum, too, a.k.a. spin.

The velocity of these little balls is the equivalent of 1 milliampere per electron. 

A current loop also generates a magnetic field. see: Bohr Magneton.

So each mole of hydrogen atoms has the electrical potential energy equivalent of 6 to the 2oth power amperes when converted from atoms to plasma.

....and it would take the same energy to complete ionize hydrogen (convert gas to plasma)

Scientists are quick to calculate nuclear binding energy conversion but somehow overlook electron binding energy conversion

They don't overlook it. The simply know that the work function  to remove an electron from an atom is monotonic, while the work function to remove a particle from a nucleus is not.  Let it sink in, because that's the crux of the matter.

The nuclear binding energy is of course many orders more than the electron binding energy but isolating neutrons and accelerating them into atomic cores to pop out another neutron is tricky and a highly regulated activity.

...but it is not the only way. An electron capture by the nucleus (inside the nucleus) also taps nuclear energy.
Also, an increase in the angular momentum of the nucleus by RF / NMR stimulation, can cause an ejection of a very fast electron from the nucleus without liberating any neutrons (see Reiss Howard patent).  That is a real energy gain because the ejected electron has much higher energy than the stimulating RF photon.

I still believe what Tesla was magnifying in his magnifying transmitter is what was happening in his air ionizing things called spark gaps.  Say you just pickup a current with a velocity when distributed into a resistance results in a 1/2 watt electron cascade event per cycle.  The cycle is repeated billions of times per second.  The power is quite interesting.  This device is then set to magnification which lowers it's intensity but effects a greater field.  So what was Tesla magnifying?

Maybe voltage or free electrons or ions...but all at the expense of the input energy, because the ionization work function of the electron is monotonic. ...unless the electron is emitted by a neutron.

[Hoppy]

@all,

I knocked-up the circuit shown in post 17331 using a TL494 based PWM generator to pulse the mosfet at a frequency around 100KHz. By tuning both the frequency and duty cycle to achieve maximum voltage across the cap bank, I could light a 40W mains lamp. The 0.5uF cap across the transformer is necessary to get the cap bank charging. Without it, the voltage will only climb very slowly and not very high. With the cap connected, the voltage will climb above 200V, so must be monitored to ensure it does not exceed the voltage rating of the caps. I have tried a few different transformers with a 24V AC output but none of these can be made to make the vibration noise heard in the video (Kapanadze 'green box' and Aqua1 noise), accompanied by a rise in voltage across the cap bank when the lamp was switched on at around 115V. I only have 3000uF, whereas in the video, the cap bank was 6000uF / 150V, so I will be increasing my bank to at least 6,000uF / 450V once I receive a few more caps off ebay. It is possible that the transformer used in the video had a poor build with loose laminations. Does anyone recognise this transformer as it appears to be very old with an unusual build?

Video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JCOEjb0Ag_I

[sparks]

Maybe voltage or free electrons or ions...but all at the expense of the input energy, because the ionization work function of the electron is monotonic. ...unless the electron is emitted by a neutron.

   This is the part I don't get.   The emitted electron by all accounts was moving about the atomic core at very high velocity.  Granted it didn't roam far but in terms of body lengths it is pretty damn quick.  Then along comes the electro-magnetic disruptive photon which appears to negate the force binding the electron in it's orbital.  The emitted electron was not only moving at high velocity in an orbital it was also moving due to thermal energy of the entire atom.  Of course any sampling of a heated gas the kinetic energy of the gas is pretty randomized but a certain percentage of the free electrons will have already been moving towards the anode of the spark gap.  When these electrons collide with the anode they convert a portion of the original thermal energy of the atom into electrical energy in the primary of an attached rf transformer.  The collisions also creates a wide spectrum of electromagnetic radiation cause that is what happens when electron inertia is changed.  It was going fast and now it is going slow so it radiated it's inertia off by producing braking radiation.  If this braking radiation supplies the photons needed to ionize more gas atoms then an electron cascade event occurs.  Large amounts of accelerated electrons bombard the anode.  When the plasma (which grows from each electrode) connects all is lost.  The electric accelerating field no longer exists and the spark gap becomes a simple conductor.  Your power input sees a short and pop goes the fuses.  It is far better to have the gap capacitance discharge into an inductor before any electrons leave the cathode and travel to the anode.  This inductor has to store the energy used to charge the gap while serving to relax the electron cascade generator.  Of course there is no perfect system and input energy will be converted to heat in the circuits but my bet is that the electron thermal energy conversion to electrical current in a negative plasma we call copper will be in excess of the machines operating power requirements.