Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[captainkt]

@Acca, am I to believe your device works with figures like these and for 2 years. Why no post or clue. Are you a man of your word ?  not just glory seeking ?
If you are a truthful man then I will start up with my Kapagen bits again.
Regards
Keith

[sparks]

    So the anode appears to be lacking charged mass.   Something like the "holes" in an led.  Or what Franklin determined was positive electricity.  I think Tesla was right.  If we had a big piece of wire and put it in the ground to catch alot of charged mass and routed the wire into high altitudes  the charged mass would continually flow towards all the "holes"in space.  As the atmosphere becomes rarified it becomes more positively charged.  (increased space to mass ratio)   Now what if this man was going to create a conductor from here to where there is alot of places to stash electrons.   What if he was going to create coherent high frequency emwaves and ionize all the air at low altitudes into a plasma column.  The free electrons in the sheath of the plasma then start to move away from the negatively charged Earth and towards positively charged space with a motor of some sort between the two driving a generator.  They named a weapon after Tesla.  It uses coherent light to ionize air molecules which creates a wire between the target and the gun.  They can then move electrons from the target to an anode or move electrons to the target from a cathode.
Or they can just impart some wave motion to the plasma and have it beach on the target. 
    Cosmologists can not figure out where the missing mass energy is.  Any chance they are overlooking huge amounts of plasma currents.  If the currents are at constant velocity they would not emit any light, until such things as star's create a resistance to the currents and the fully ionized plasma "cools" into hot gasses.  Vast clouds of protons with electron sheaths moving at constant velocity feeding star's and blackholes and such.
  At the very least if we could create a conductive plasma in place of Ben Franklin's wet kite string and control natural lightning.  Lightning rods are great for creating space charge electrons and all to insulate the structures residing on the Earth cathode.  I think it would be better instead of shifting the problem to some unknown strike zone to a place where we could use the current.

[Grumage]

@Acca, am I to believe your device works with figures like these and for 2 years. Why no post or clue. Are you a man of your word ?  not just glory seeking ?
If you are a truthful man then I will start up with my Kapagen bits again.
Regards
Keith

Dear Keith.

I do not feel that it's Acca's integrity that is the issue here, more the integrity of the method used for power measurement!!

If you dear Acca are trusting the readings given by the output "Killawatt" meter then I think you are grossly mistaken. There would be so much HF flowing through that the electronics would be baffled by the signals it recieved. See here. http://www.overunity.com/7679/selfrunning-free-energy-devices-up-to-5-kw-from-tariel-kapanadze/msg353498/#msg353498. This was my own proof!!

Also if I am not mistaken Jean louis proved beyond any doubt that the Kappagen was only 98 % efficent.

Best wishes. Grum.

[verpies]

If you dear Acca are trusting the readings given by the output "Killawatt" meter then I think you are grossly mistaken.
There would be so much HF flowing through that the electronics would be baffled by the signals it recieved. See here. . This was my own proof!!

Yes, HF confuses meters a lot (both clamp-on and wired ones).  Even kHz are enough to confuse most meters.  Watch this video.
Furthermore, waveform shapes different than sine confuse them too. Watch this video.
The "Killawatt" meter is designed for 50-60Hz sine AC.

An incandescent light bulb with non-coiled filament, coupled to a photosensor, is much better than all those meters at HF.
Also, a good option is a Watt-->Volt converter like this one (but preferably based on the 2GHz multiplier ADL5391, that costs only $7)

[Hoppy]

Dear Keith.

I do not feel that it's Acca's integrity that is the issue here, more the integrity of the method used for power measurement!!

If you dear Acca are trusting the readings given by the output "Killawatt" meter then I think you are grossly mistaken. There would be so much HF flowing through that the electronics would be baffled by the signals it recieved. See here. http://www.overunity.com/7679/selfrunning-free-energy-devices-up-to-5-kw-from-tariel-kapanadze/msg353498/#msg353498. This was my own proof!!

Also if I am not mistaken Jean louis proved beyond any doubt that the Kappagen was only 98 % efficent.

Best wishes. Grum.

Evening Grum,

Well, 98% efficient is a significant result, especially given the use of an ineficient MOT and an 'open' and loose coupled step-down transformer. If this is really an accurate efficiency measurement, which I doubt, then this setup deserves a lot more attention from us.