Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[dllabarre]

The problem in this thread,is there are different classes of people....
Then there's the rest of us,trying to make sense of all this madness,and people wonder why this thread goes nowhere.

This was funny but oh so true. 
In my mind I was able to connect real posters in this thread with the descriptions you presented.
Thanks,
DonL

[Hoppy]

This was funny but oh so true. 
In my mind I was able to connect real posters in this thread with the descriptions you presented.
Thanks,
DonL

Variety, the spice of life 

[Grumage]

Dear  cheappower2012.

I found your comments interesting but I fear you forgot to mention the largest group!! They don't have hats... They're bald... They are called Vultures.... waiting in the wings, ready to snatch an idea or clue that some of the harder working members have found.

All I can say is thank goodness that there is such a vast pool of intelect within this forum, and by sharing ideas we will come up with the goods, so to speak.

Best wishes, Grum.

[Hoppy]

Dear  cheappower2012.

I found your comments interesting but I fear you forgot to mention the largest group!! They don't have hats... They're bald... They are called Vultures.... waiting in the wings, ready to snatch an idea or clue that some of the harder working members have found.

All I can say is thank goodness that there is such a vast pool of intelect within this forum, and by sharing ideas we will come up with the goods, so to speak.

Best wishes, Grum.

Its hat's off to you Grum for feeding those vultures 

[sparks]

The virtual particles particle physics theorists have to keep putting in their equations aren't virtual at all.   They flow around and create magnetic field effects.   They are the scource of charge on stuff like electrons.   A variable reluctance generator operates at pretty good efficiency.  Below is a quote from a Mr.Paul Brown addressing an alternative energy symposium.



First of all, l would like to thank the sponsors of this symposium for inviting me to speak and let me say that I'm glad to be here. I will be speaking of variable reluctance alternators in general while primarily dealing with what I termed "the magnetic distributor system". Some of you are familiar with my work already, but for those of you who are not, let me give you a quick review of this work to date.
Conventional practice is to circulate a conductive wire through a magnetic field, thus producing a true sine wave output. However, the shortcoming of this system is expressed by Lenz's law, which places an upper limit on the efficiency of such a machine.
Reluctance alternators consist of a plurality of permanent magnets, each of which has a wire coil wrapped around it. Magnetic flux is produced when an iron segment (known as the reluctor) passes in proximity to the magnet assembly. These type alternators operate at about 30% efficiency and produce a high voltage, low current pulse. The output power is low from no magnetic reversal and the magnetic field is not allowed to fall. This system is commonly used in breakerless auto ignitions.
Inductance alternators consist of a field core with iron "legs". Each of these legs is wrapped by a wire coil. The flux is produced by a rotating iron segment. Alternators of this type are used in radio communications because the high frequency output varies directly with rpm. These units also operate at about a 30% efficiency, have no magnetic reversal, and no falling field.
Some time ago, I became acquainted with John Ecklin's SAG-6 concept. This non-conventional generator design skirts Lenz's law due to the fact that the field and output cores are stationary with the magnetic flux being altered by an iron segment that interrupts the magnetic path. We did assemble a small model to test the principle and it worked, but we were looking for a means of utilizing the "electrical spike" or falling field. Conventional electrical engineers spend their time trying to prevent these high pressure phenomena because these power surges "blow out" conventional systems. We came up with a design that utilizes this pulsed power for the production of useful current. It is a four pole modification of the Kromrey converter.
My attempts to build this non-conventional alternator at the University of California were delayed and ultimately stopped for various reasons. It was at this point that I submitted my project proposal to the Moss Research Group. Moss Research is a privately funded group of individuals working independently toward a common goal. It is this cumulative effort that results in progress. No one in the organization uses the term "proprietary" and researchers freely discuss their work and theories. I was granted funding and assigned frame number one on the stipulation that all my work be of public knowledge.
A basic explanation of the principle of stationary permanent magnet or DC electromagnet in proximity to the AC assembly with an intermittent iron rotor. It is best to think of magnetism as a fluid and iron is a conductor for this fluid.
When the rotor fills the gap, magnetism flows through a closed iron circuit, as indicated by the arrows. This flow sets up a magnetic field around the output coil. As the rotor opens the gap, the flow of magnetism through the output core ceases. This causes the magnetic field to collapse through the output coil. It is this rising and falling field, in the output coil, that produces the magnetic flux necessary for the production of AC current.
The Linemann configuration, as tested, incorporated four poles rather than two. We used the standard guidelines for the assembly of conventional alternators and transformers during the construction of number one. This means laminated steel wherever magnetic reversal occurs to prevent hysterisis losses, minimum air gaps, poly-thermaleze wire, sufficient turns of wire to produce magnetic saturization, a non-ferrous frame to prevent magnetic losses, etc. Our initial test data was published; some of you may have seen that paper.
There is no relative motion between the magnets and wire. Magnetism requires time for propagation; the rotor accelerates into the poles, and decelerates while pulling away. The result of all this is a dynamically balanced rotor that produces no net torque on the shaft during operation. By this, I mean that the only resistances to the rotation of the shaft are mechanical in nature. Thus, only a small amount of horsepower is required for the prime mover. We matched a 1/10 hp electric motor to this alternator for testing. From the design, you can see that the AC power has a frequency directly proportional to the rpm of the rotor assembly. The magnitude of the voltage is proportional to the rate of change of the magnetic flux, therefore the voltage is also directly proportional to the speed of the rotor, while the amperage is proportional to the duration of pole interfacing.
At this point it would probably be beneficial to point out the difference between magnetic and electromagnetic induction. Magnetic induction is the induction of a current in a conducting circuit by variation of the magnetic flux linking the circuit. For this to occur, all that is required is a relative motion between the conducting circuit and the lines of magnetic force. This does not require motion of the magnetic flux nor the association of an electric field. While for electromagnetic induction, the electric and magnetic fields are perpendicular and a variation of the magnetic flux causes a back electromagnetic field to be induced in the conductor. The magnitude of this back electromagnetic field is proportional to the rate at which the flux through the circuit varies. The main point here is that, without the association of an electric field in the induction circuit, Lenz's law no longer applies. This has long been known in homopolar theory and Das Gupta made note of the fact that no torque exists between the rotating disc and the field magnet, back in 1963. And without Lenz's law, no eddy-currents are produced to oppose the motion of the rotor.
During testing, the alternator ran cold and a direct short on the output coils did not throw a load on the drive motor. We also noticed that there is an increase in the rotor speed when an electrical load is applied.
We used resistive loads during the power measurements. The most efficient test was at 2800 rpm with the field coils in parallel, and drawing 180 watts of power (12 V at IS A). The motor was using 219 watts (115 V at 1.9 A). thus the total input power was 399 watts. From this test the alternator output was 240 VAC at 1.8 amps for a total power output of 432 watts.
With a one amp load, the alternator worked at a 99% efficiency.
During testing we found that the input power for field excitation could be eliminated by the use of capacitors. This is accomplished simply by shunting the DC coil with a capacitor of the appropriate capacitance. The really amazing part was that the output power actually increased from the use of capacitors in the field circuit. This phenomenon took some time and testing to explain, and as usual, there is a simple principle involved to explain this action. That principle is the resonance between two LC circuits.
Every physical system, in general, has one or more natural vibration frequencies, characteristic of the system itself. If such a system is subjected to impulses of some arbitrary frequency, it will necessarily vibrate with that frequency even though it is not one of those natural to it. These "forced vibrations" may be very feeble, but if the impressed frequency is varied, the response becomes more vigorous whenever any one of the natural frequencies is approached, its amplitude increasing manyfold as exact synchronization is reached. This is resonance.
Electrical resonance, for a circuit composed of a coil in series with a capacitor, is a condition which tends to produce relatively great currents in reactive circuits. This condition produces a minimum impedence and a unity power factor. If the resistance is small the current will become large and, as the voltage across the capacitor of the coil is the product of the current and impedance, it also becomes very large. Also, capacitor discharge in an LC circuit produces a damped oscillation. At resonance, it is the electrical resistance of the circuit which is the only factor preventing self-sustaining oscillations.
With this alternator we not only have achieved electrical resonance but the harmonic resonance of two loosely coupled LC circuits at the same fundamental frequency. This is analogous to an oscillator circuit tuned for resonance between two capacitors. Harmonic amplification due to resonance produces beat notes which are audible if you listen closely. It is this large flow of current through the DC coils that produces the high intensity excitation field for the AC coils.
Again, the test data was published separately. So, here we will concern ourselves only with the most efficient run which produced an output of 588 watts (490 V at 1.2 A) while the only input power was that of the 1/10 h.p. motor or 219 watts. Now we find the efficiency at 268%.
Now with our knowledge of the principles governing the operation of this alternator we can look at it with a new perspective. This understanding enables us to perceive the Hendershot system incorporated in the design. His device used two LC circuits and resonance was achieved through electromechanical excitation of the system.
Further testing revealed the circulation of currents through the frame and corrosion between the dissimilar metals produced a diode effect. The core iron is a conductor of electricity as well as a conductor of magnetic flux, and voltages induced in it by the changing flux passing through, cause the flow of electric current through it. Now we recognize the influence of the Coler effect. The principle of his device is that he ran current through the magnet cores.
There are variables that influence the performance of this device that are not yet fully accounted for. For instance, location, the weather, and orientation all have had an influence on its output at one time or another. Also, the characteristics of the rotor dramatically affect the machine's Performance. Other anomalous effects have been noted. For these reasons we must admit to ourselves that this machine is not only an alternator but also a transducer. A most important point to make here is that other people have duplicated these results. We are not discussing a one time occurence or an anomaly. Another curious phenomenon demonstrated by this alternator is the sudden surges of high power that literally burn out the load. At present, my objective is to tune in to that peak power with a circuit controller to maintain that high output level with regulation to prevent overloading the circuit. This is not a finished model, but a test stand, to acquire the data necessary to build a production model. Currently, we are working with the Mandala configuration that will be outlined later by Charles Moss.
In conclusion: The law of conservation of energy has been proven innumerable times. Surely this axiom of science must be true. Simply stated, this law says that the amount of energy within any closed system remains constant. If that is true, then the above unity performance of this alternator forces us to assume that this device operates in an open system, which then makes this viable evidence for the existence of an ether. Further, we can deduce that this ether is dynamic in nature and is unshieldable, making it impossible to create a perfectly "closed" system.
The simplicity and elementary design of this alternator coupled with the high efficiency and anomalous effects produced by the prototype warrant further research into this system for the production of power.

powered by greenstone3