Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[verpies]

I have been searching for the answer to this for years.
It represents three types of LRC tank circuit wave forms (As opposed to RLC)
Don Smith said the last one is what you need to find in order to get OU.
Does anyone know where this information came from or what the theory is?   Maybe Verpies??

It is from the part of physics called lumped Circuit Theory.
In the nomenclature that I know RLC is no different from LRC and LCR circuit.
The different waveforms are cause by a different Damping Factor (also called alpha sometimes).
The third waveform will appear if the R in LRC is negative.

[verpies]

Would surely like it more if this guy had the answer to free energy. But maybe I missed it between the lines.
»Everyone knows that it is because once you admit that the E/M field is composed of radiation, you have to explain why the proton and electron aren't diminished by this radiation. We can create the sub-particle called the quark with no guilt or sin, since it doesn't immediately threaten to undermine the conservation of energy. But if the electrical field is composed of radiation, and if this radiation has mass, why doesn't the proton lose mass in radiating it? It is simply to avoid this question that the great mess of the electrical field has been left to sit. Physicists prefer a big mess and a big cover-up to an honest question. «

I agree with Mathis about a lot of stuff, including much of his mainstream science bashing, but not with everything.
Free Energy is not his focus but an in-depth understanding of the "wheelwork of the universe'.

Incidentally there are concepts "between the lines' of his many articles that can help our cause, but you will have to find them yourself

[GeoFusion]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ljKX9Om7Z4s


just for your entertainment


this is B.S.
but you guys need to have sometime something that is  just ,simply light and laughable to relax




Wesley

@ Wesley

Hahah Did  Laugh hard at the part he shorted the wires at that circuit  .
Yes sometimes ppl need something funny or good kind of crazy aside to relaxing and laugh about, something to break the ice.

Looks like something that could work but not sure.
Btw, thank you for uploading your recent translations on youtube. Nice work man. Soon enough i'll be able to upload some new material too and share it all, with Schematics.

Cheerz~

[verpies]

All electromagnetic as well as any non-electromagnetic fields are a result of the Aether/Vortex interactions. If there was no Aether, we could not explain the existence of matter, as all matter is dependent on it for its existence.

Yes, we could. I know at least three coherent theories that do that.
I'm growing tired of having to repeatedly demonstrate that the old Aether concept is an infantile idea and makes no sense. I've been through it on this forum so many times, I lost count.  Being aware what is actually being confused for it, makes it even worse.

But here we go again: Are there any takers that are willing to define Aether and its properties to me without falling in conflict with empirical observations?

[Khwartz]

It is from the part of physics called lumped Circuit Theory.
In the nomenclature that I know RLC is no different from LRC and LCR circuit.
The different waveforms are cause by a different Damping Factor (also called alpha sometimes).
The third waveform will appear if the R in LRC is negative.

Thanks for these data! So, how can we get "negative resistance", if not indeed an active dipole? :/

I someone knows how Don Could do that?