Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[Farmhand]

Convert Static Voltage to Any Amount of Electrical Power Required

Program I will be the conversion of a static voltage (available world wide) from a simple static source to furnish (freely) any amount of electrical power desired. It is simple and very cheap to provide a static voltage source—indeed, one may take the necessary "source static voltage" directly from the earth-electrosphere vertical voltage gradient anywhere and everywhere on Earth. This "charged earth-to-electrosphere" voltage gradient averages about 300,000 volts {64}. When standing, its voltage difference between one's head and one's foot may thus reach about 250 volts or even more.

As a "source" for the proper asymmetric circuit or system, a static voltage can be made to potentialize the charges in a briefly-connected external circuit (or a great number of them) without drawing current.

The freely-potentialized external circuit can then be disconnected from the source (with circuit charges still pinned and zero current), and its gap recompleted (as, e.g., by adding a diode and a resistor in series, with the diode oriented in the "current pumped around the loop" direction). This makes the freely potentialized external circuit complete again, but as a separate system entirely separated from the original static voltage source.

Once the separated external circuit is recompleted, its charges are allowed to come unpinned and current will flow in it, powering the load while the freely-potentialized circuit dissipates its potential energy. Then the process is iterated; the gap is re-opened and the static source is reconnected with the charges again pinned, to again freely potentialize the external circuit.

So one potentializes freely and statically with original source connected, and then dissipates the collected excess potential energy dynamically and separately from the original source.

In this manner the static voltage source will iteratively furnish all the electrical power in a specific circuit that one wishes, literally without limit, and without having to do work just to continue having the source. If one uses only voltage input from the static voltage source to one's external circuit, then no change in the source's static voltage occurs, because no current flows from or through it, and hence no electrical power is drawn from it or used to destroy it.

Use of a static voltage source in this current-free fashion is beyond simply repeating the WW II use of the known difference of potential (between a jungle treetop and the earth's surface) to draw sufficient power (both current and voltage) to power a small radio in the South Pacific. There the troops used only the standard symmetric EM circuit, which has to draw power (both voltage and current) from the earth-electrosphere voltage difference source utilized and thus has to do work in getting the radios powered.

The overall power that can be drawn directly from a segment of the static earth-electrosphere capacitor's voltage and charge is very small, but if one draws only voltage (with dq/dt = 0) and uses the proper asymmetric circuitry to collect and flow (shuttle) that voltage onto pinned charges q in a collecting circuit, then one can take and use just the voltage. Using this free static voltage to potentialize the external circuit will produce the desired amount of free potential energy W in the asymmetric collecting system (on those pinned charges q) that one requires, by the simple equation W = Vq. If we do not allow any current from the external circuit and load to flow back through the dipolar voltage source, then all we continually need from the source is the voltage V itself. That can and will be sustained indefinitely by the source. Freely! Forever!

"Static voltage" is actually a dynamic set of ongoing bidirectional EM energy flows (longitudinal waves), as rigorously shown by Whittaker in 1903 {65}. Hence so-called "static" voltage will indeed flow (without doing work) onto a "statically connected" collection circuit containing pinned charges q, "potentializing" that receiving circuit so that stored potential energy W = Vq appears in it.

This "statically potentialized" (excited) collection circuit is then separated from the static voltage source. The gap left by the disconnected primary static source is recompleted (say, by a resistor and diode in series across the gap) as a separate external circuit and system, and then this separated circuit's freely collected EM potential energy is dissipated in its loads to power them. This results in delivering a fixed amount of free power to the loads to power them, completely independently of the primary static source (the electrosphere, in this example) {66}. Any convenient and very cheap static voltage source can be substituted.

This type of asymmetric system and circuitry is a part of the Heaviside model equations that Lorentz {59} deliberately discarded in 1892 by arbitrarily symmetrizing the equations for the specific purpose of eliminating all such systems, insuring that electrical engineers build only COP<1.0 power systems insofar as taking the energy from the local vacuum potential is concerned. Since then, EEs have always built and used only symmetrized power systems, thus directly generating the world's present energy crisis.

Rapid and Decisive Solution of the World Energy Crisis

If a capacitor is charged from the atmospheric potential then there was a current that took place when it was charged. Then when the capacitor is discharged through the load there is current again. Any capacitor that is charged is the result of a flow of charges which is current. No current means no flow of charge which means no energy.

It is the energy density that make atmospheric systems difficult, the current to charge the capacitor from the atmospheric potential is feeble so the actual energy able to be utilized is limited in that way.

...

[Zeitmaschine]

Any capacitor that is charged is the result of a flow of charges which is current. No current means no flow of charge which means no energy.

Charging by induction? Current flows only from ground not from the (not connected) static HV source.

Thinking asymmetrically: Is this another asymmetrical capacitor? One plate brass the other steel and a coil between. So is that TK motor an asymmetrical LC circuit perhaps? And why is it that Steven Mark was going through that trouble with his power unit in making it toroidal shaped? There are obviously no wires in that toroid as one can see when it is cut apart. Hence this is not a toroidal shaped coil, but what we can see by looking at the cross-section is that it is composed of some different materials which could work as an asymmetrical capacitor. Inclusive the electrical tape outside isolating the high voltage connected to that capacitor. And as it seems the TPU is still working although a piece is cut out of it.

Hence, happy asym-cap building ...
(thanks to T. E. Bearden)

[a.king21]

What is the patent number?.

What is the patent number?.

568177


609250

[stivep]

Connecting some dots ...

Dot #1:

That statement sounds as if at least one »out of the ordinary« asymmetrical electronic component is needed in order to get a COP>1.0 EM system. Now what about an asymmetrical capacitor? An asymmetrical capacitor like this one perhaps, consisting of an aluminum foil and a thin wire. It is called a EHD thruster and works due to the Biefeld–Brown effect.

Dot #2:

So, TK was looking into anti-gravity? Isn't it interesting that a EHD thruster (which works with high voltage and is in fact an asymmetrical capacitor) creates something like anti-gravity? Even if it is not real anti-gravity (not sure about that), it seems that experimenting with it led TK to his FE device.

Dot #3:

OK, what about an asymmetrical capacitor NACAP made of copper as »the self-made secret«? Wouldn't that be a nice candidate?

Therefore: We should look for an electronic part »so simple you'd laugh« but nevertheless not available at Radio Shack.

And yes, we should strictly avoid sparking and arcing because this would draw an unwanted current from our high voltage source.


Regards

do not forget to look at page 11 as well.


http://www.distinti.com/docs/the_secrets_of_qvxb.pdf




Wesley

[pepsimaxzu]

i think the key is in 2004 vid. but i cant found any translated video.

in TK motor i totaly agree with mister jbignes5. this motor based on fig 17 on this page:
http://www.tfcbooks.com/tesla/1892-02-03.htm