Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[semenihin-77]

Kapanadze said on Russian-classical scheme Tesla.

[magpwr]

Resonance make on Tesla coil is wery smple, then you find resonance, the voltage on secondary coil rise wery much. You can hold neon lamp near secondary coil  and then you gett resonance, then it lights. But I try many times get energy from secondary, but I only get about 70-90 precents efficienty. So resonance not giving energy.

hi MenoFather and everyone,

I would have to agree with you-MenoFather getting just "one" receiver coil in resonance with transmitter coil will not yield over-unity best would be around 90% efficient.

But what if there is 2 or better still there is 3 receiver coil in resonance and in close proximity with transmitter coil.Question to you would there be overunity in this configuration ?

Just like one radio transmitter is able to broadcast to many radios even crystal radios without effecting another crystal radio somewhere nearby.


I have attached a working Tesla transmitter and receiver lighting a mains bulb about 1.5 meter away.
  Без проводка
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFMwg52dbmU

Schematic of Tesla transmitter base on above video.
Схема ГТБМ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pra2gMwjVX0

The receiver Tesla coil is just mains bulb and aluminum plate(Bottom of similar telsa coil and plate is connected to mains bulb.Take note the aluminum plate spacing to telsa coil is similar to a "tuning air cap" to get maximum resonance and output).
I did not save the link where the above youtube user demonstrate this similar device in an exhibition.But there was 2 earth ground used for transmitter and receiver(alu plate to earth).

Do you think if there is 3 receiver tesla coil as shown in video each located around 1.5m from the transmitter.Would there be ou if all these are linked to form a output.This output power from 3 receiver would be higher than the transmitter."Just imagine that"."Take note receiver coil located 1.5m away will not effect oscillation of transmitter coil"

[ctbenergy]

Totally passive? Same as the Stepanov device. Can anyone see more than two transformers and a capacitor connected to a disk saw via two power meters? I can't.

Taking a closer look at the carpenter transformers. The three-phase transformer (white) next to the three-phase capacitor (dusky pink) is not fully connected. It looks like a step-down transformer but the secondary low voltage high amps coils (thick white wires) are all open. Hence my guess is that the primary coils of that transformer are working as three-phase chokes in resonance with the three-phase capacitor next to it.

Then what's the second transformer for? Does this transformer perhaps provide high voltage? Just 2 to 5 KV, not real high voltage? So could it be important to have an electric field of a few KV 50Hz sine wave in resonance with the LC circuit formed by the chokes and the capacitors? Could it be that the cable 4 is the HV cable coming from the HV transformer and the cable 3 provides the primaries of that HV transformer with 380V? 

What could happen if an electrostatic field of one transformer (HV) is mixed with an electromagnetic field of a second transformer (LV)? Could the calculation »electromagnetic field times electrostatic field« be responsible for the generation of those strange observed ground currents?

Regards

And the other building blocks are chokes and transformers.

All right. There remains one simple question to be asked: Why is it that a carpenter (Stepanov) and also others (like Kapanadze and Barbosa) could stumble over a Free Energy transformer configuration by chance, but people doing experiments since years on their workbenches do not? Is it because they are all working with three-phase transformers? Actually YES and NO. It is NOT because of the three-phase feature. It is because of the STEP-UP feature of those transformers. Normally you won't get a 220V/50Hz step-up transformer with a number of KV output at the next radio shop. But you will get a 380V step-up transformer in professional three-phase design.

Meaning? Don't experiment with flybacks. Neither high frequency nor DC nor pulsed high voltage (with or without a spark gap) will do it. Use 50Hz sine wave high voltage (e.g. from a microwave oven transformer) instead. The high(er) voltage has to be in resonance with a LC circuit.

So as it appears, we are now down to three single building blocks: Two transformers (one step-up, one as choke) and one capacitor. Happy connecting!!

Also quite interesting how quickly this posting of mine got buried without any real reply.

Regards

Hi Zeitmaschine,

where does the cable 4 go and where does the cable 3 come from?
can you explain the connections in simple steps?

Regards

[Farmhand]

hi MenoFather and everyone,

I would have to agree with you-MenoFather getting just "one" receiver coil in resonance with transmitter coil will not yield over-unity best would be around 90% efficient.

But what if there is 2 or better still there is 3 receiver coil in resonance and in close proximity with transmitter coil.Question to you would there be overunity in this configuration ?

Just like one radio transmitter is able to broadcast to many radios even crystal radios without effecting another crystal radio somewhere nearby.


I have attached a working Tesla transmitter and receiver lighting a mains bulb about 1.5 meter away.
  Без проводка
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFMwg52dbmU

Schematic of Tesla transmitter base on above video.
Схема ГТБМ
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pra2gMwjVX0

The receiver Tesla coil is just mains bulb and aluminum plate(Bottom of similar telsa coil and plate is connected to mains bulb.Take note the aluminum plate spacing to telsa coil is similar to a "tuning air cap" to get maximum resonance and output).
I did not save the link where the above youtube user demonstrate this similar device in an exhibition.But there was 2 earth ground used for transmitter and receiver(alu plate to earth).

Do you think if there is 3 receiver tesla coil as shown in video each located around 1.5m from the transmitter.Would there be ou if all these are linked to form a output.This output power from 3 receiver would be higher than the transmitter."Just imagine that"."Take note receiver coil located 1.5m away will not effect oscillation of transmitter coil"

Here is the deal, all tests I have seen show the transmitter input power is always much more than the output of any amount of receivers together, if the transmitter input is 10 Watts and each receiver outputs 0.1 Watts it would take 100 receivers to break even, and even then it would show less output from all receivers than is input to the one transmitter.

Try it and see, there are too many people just repeating what the distractors like Don Smith and Utkin, and Keshe and Meyl imply but never actually show.

Enough talk, show it and get it sorted what is truth and what isn't.

We need to consider energy input to the transmitter and useful energy output from the receivers as intended work.

Tesla clearly states that even his "Wireless" system "with low Hertz radiations" can only operate at below 100 % efficiency. Why people ignore him and call him a liar ? Only a portion of the energy emitted by the "radiating" transmitter can be captured and utilized, and a small portion at that. If the receivers are placed at a small enough distance for capacitive or inductive effects to be at play directly then the output from each receiver can be a greater portion than when the receiver is remote, but the total output energy emitted by the transmitter is all that is available to be received by the receivers ( shared ), and there will be losses, meaning the total energy received will always be less than the energy emitted by the transmitter.

It is so easy to try, simply wind four solenoids the same (with some adjustment of the L/C) and feed one with an exciting current, then place a load on each receiver and measure the input v output.

The big misunderstanding is that a receiver collects and utilizes more than a small fraction of the transmitter output ( when it does not), and if we have a transmitter with 5 Watts input and a receiver with 0.1 Watts output, it would take 50 receivers to get near the input in output. However it would be simple to get three or more receivers to all output the same power level of 0.1 Watts, having more than one receiver duplicating the output of the first one that is only a small fraction of the input energy to the transmitter is easy and indicates nothing in the realm of OU.

This is a never ending fallacy, the experiment has been done by a few people and was shown to be not OU at all in any way whatsoever. I say before people spread more myths they should do the simple experiment to show what they say is true.

Cheers

[magpwr]

Here is the deal, all tests I have seen show the transmitter input power is always much more than the output of any amount of receivers together, if the transmitter input is 10 Watts and each receiver outputs 0.1 Watts it would take 100 receivers to break even, and even then it would show less output from all receivers than is input to the one transmitter.

Try it and see, there are too many people just repeating what the distractors like Don Smith and Utkin, and Keshe and Meyl imply but never actually show.

Enough talk, show it and get it sorted what is truth and what isn't.

We need to consider energy input to the transmitter and useful energy output from the receivers as intended work.

Tesla clearly states that even his "Wireless" system "with low Hertz radiations" can only operate at below 100 % efficiency. Why people ignore him and call him a liar ? Only a portion of the energy emitted by the "radiating" transmitter can be captured and utilized, and a small portion at that. If the receivers are placed at a small enough distance for capacitive or inductive effects to be at play directly then the output from each receiver can be a greater portion than when the receiver is remote, but the total output energy emitted by the transmitter is all that is available to be received by the receivers ( shared ), and there will be losses, meaning the total energy received will always be less than the energy emitted by the transmitter.

It is so easy to try, simply wind four solenoids the same (with some adjustment of the L/C) and feed one with an exciting current, then place a load on each receiver and measure the input v output.

The big misunderstanding is that a receiver collects and utilizes more than a small fraction of the transmitter output ( when it does not), and if we have a transmitter with 5 Watts input and a receiver with 0.1 Watts output, it would take 50 receivers to get near the input in output. However it would be simple to get three or more receivers to all output the same power level of 0.1 Watts, having more than one receiver duplicating the output of the first one that is only a small fraction of the input energy to the transmitter is easy and indicates nothing in the realm of OU.

This is a never ending fallacy, the experiment has been done by a few people and was shown to be not OU at all in any way whatsoever. I say before people spread more myths they should do the simple experiment to show what they say is true.

Cheers

hi Farmhand,

You mentioned about tesla wireless system where it typically comprised of 1 transmitter and 1 receiver and yes it would surely be less than 100% efficient as i mentioned previously.I agree with you 100% on this part.
"Tesla clearly states that even his "Wireless" system "with low Hertz radiations" can only operate at below 100 % efficiency."

I don't recall any video demonstration as found in the internet which shows 1 transmitter Tesla coil and 3 receiver tesla coil lighting a "mains bulb".
There is no harm thinking outside the box and take note i have mentioned having 3 receiver coil around 1.5m apart from transmitter coil which would not effect the oscillation of transmitter coil.In another words there is no additional detectable load at transmitter end.

Typically what we have seen is a 1 transmitter and 1 receiver coil in proximity as found in the net in whatever configuration .


--------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm currently working on Don smith which is comprise of 1 transmitter coil(primary) and 2 receiver coil(CW &CCW Coil).
The parts typically take ages to arrive ~1 month.But i can't complaint since shipment from certain countries is free.

In the meantime --------------------

I have just completed my ultimate mazilli circuit version v1.0 which is "short circuit proof" which prevent burnout of "precious mosfet" which cost money .Yes i have said it short circuit proof.

I will be uploading this video later today  "sanjev21" along with short circuit test(reduced power drawn from battery to <8watt from >100watt) at output and lighting 1KW 220volt bulb at <200watt initial start.

The secret i'm using 5ns bi direction zener diode 600watt surge loading, 2 x <20ns 600v diode and changed 2 pull ups  1kohms  to 270 ohms after researching in the net on induction heating.
I'm using 1 small heatsink with fan shared by 2 mosfet.

-------------------------

I have just uploaded my Ultimate Mazzilli Circuit v1.0 which is short circuit proof and the best one which doesn't destroy Mosfets $$$.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0u6gAUPlnTQ