Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[magpwr]

Hey Mag

In relation with Don Smith replications, I have conclude that if you don't raise the frequency at the output compare to the input then there is no any ou effect. In general, the higher the frequency the higher the energy. If I put at the input for example 1Mhz and then I tune to 1Mhz, then I will take the energy that I give at the input minus system losses. No ou! But if I give some energy to the primary for 1Mhz oscillations, and I make my secondary oscillating at 250Mhz as Don Smith, then the extracted energy which follows the square law will be much higher!
Unfortunately, I can't prove it because in my replication attempt I couldn't rectify my 50Mhz HV output signal as I couldn't find appropriate diodes and I stopped my replication to that point. When I'll make my Dally tests, I will come back on this.
By the way, yesterday I land again to the ground. My dally output is not more than the input. I miss something but I will try again!

Hi jeg,

Experimenting with lower voltage around 60volts but got to use typical induction heater approach for low voltage 5 turns and cap in parallel which is then connected to igbt or mosfet drain.The gate
was driven with my reverse engineered non isolated induction heater igbt driver stage powered by around 19volts.

Then i calculated the estimated 1/4 Lc resonance frequency of primary coil.I used online Lc calculator after using Lc meter to obtain secondary coil uH and decide on the capacitor to use.
Since output from secondary coil is way below 600volts.I just use 600v fast response diode for secondary.Then use capacitor to smooten output which is connected to 220volt 60w bulb.

Recall previously i have mentioned there was interference on my portable fm which placed around 4meter from don smith device.
It was hard to hear music being heard from radio.
Imagine this running pri with khz produced interference at mhz range.I did also mention short circuit at output did not produce further increase in current drawn on battery <100mA.Only at 1/4 resonance this effect is possible.The output was not impressive at 21volts for 60v boosted supply for primary.

[Jeg]

Hi

Are you not try step-down hv to normal voltage?

regards zcsaba77

I didn't try it cause i wanted to play with high voltages, but it is a nice suggestion for next time's trial! At least i will have to handle only the high frequency part and not the High voltage one.
Thanks

[Jeg]

I did also mention short circuit at output did not produce further increase in current drawn on battery <100mA.Only at 1/4 resonance this effect is possible

When you speak about 1/4 resonance you mean that your secondary is being cut at a length of 1/4 of your primary's coil wavelength?

[magpwr]

When you speak about 1/4 resonance you mean that your secondary is being cut at a length of 1/4 of your primary's coil wavelength?

Hi jeg,

It's the 1/4 frequency of primary.
L is fixed.The Capacitor needs to be selected which combine with fix coil setup would need to closely match 1/4 frequency of the primary.
I simply use online LC caculator.Using fix uH 15uH for my case for one side of the secondary coil.Through trial and error i can easily obtaib cap value to use.Remember don smith secondary coil is consisting of cw and ccw coil.

[Jeg]

Hi jeg,

It's the 1/4 frequency of primary.
L is fixed.The Capacitor needs to be selected which combine with fix coil setup would need to closely match 1/4 frequency of the primary.
I simply use online LC caculator.Using fix uH 15uH for my case for one side of the secondary coil.Through trial and error i can easily obtaib cap value to use.Remember don smith secondary coil is consisting of cw and ccw coil.

1/4 frequency of your primary would be approximately 230khz/4. The case for me is to raise the frequency and not to degrade it. But perhaps I miss something so I wish you a good luck on this. By the way, in my system I tune both secondaries with separate capacitors. By leaving one secondary floating with just a diode as in the drawings is less effective.