Selfrunning Free Energy devices up to 5 KW from Tariel Kapanadze

[NickZ]

  It's not so simple to test, as a geiger counter won't work well when there is HV radiations.
  After over a year of working directly next to Akula/Ruslan device, only inches away from it, I have not noticed any negative effects.
  Or positive effects, for that matter.

[stivep]

Well...to my humble mind  it's enough to check for radiation  around Rusla device to disprove theory, no ?

Easy answer:
Beta particles  are  particles that contains matter. They  have mass.
The  emission of betas does not stop after device was switched off.
I have noticed presence of Beta in Colman.


So you switch of   device  than take your Geiger–Müller that was stored at safe distance from the Ruslan  Generator.

[Acca]

 Wesley YOU ARE SPOT ON !! Neutrons are there ..

It's a question that the Italians have discovered the source was granitic rocks in 2007... I have posted this data in the past ..

"Mind is a terrible thing to waste" ...and words and stones can kill.... Also..



LENR - Reazioni piezonucleari - Politecnico di Torino

The English talking is at  1.40 minutes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGCUqFtbdlc
 
[size=0pt]http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/13698/7/07_chapter%201.pdf[/size]
[size=0pt]http://mit.imt.si/Revija/izvodi/mit0312/znidarsic.pdf[/size]
[size=0pt]This is the BEST book EVER below 800 pages on soft ferrites..[/size]
[size=0pt]http://www.fer.unizg.hr/_download/repository/Philips_ferrites_databook.pdf[/size]
[size=0pt]http://www.ciyiproduct.com/ciyi/magnet/product/magnet/softmagnet.htm[/size]
[size=0pt]http://www.ieee.li/pdf/viewgraphs/ferrites.pdf[/size]
[size=0pt]http://www.ferroxcube.com/FerroxcubeCorporateReception/datasheet/FXC_PSG_2013.pdf[/size]
[size=0pt]http://www.magneticsgroup.com/pdf/mmpa%20SFG-98.pdf[/size]
[size=0pt]http://benthamopen.com/contents/pdf/TOMSJ/TOMSJ-4-26.pdf[/size]
[size=0pt]http://www.cmi-ferrite.com/news/Articles/ferpro.pdf[/size]
[size=0pt]http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1002007114000835[/size]
[size=0pt]http://www.fdk.com/cyber-e/technical/pi_technical06.html[/size]
[size=0pt]http://dspace.thapar.edu:8080/dspace/bitstream/10266/561/1/Microsoft+Word+-+cover+page.pdf




[/size] Acca..

Gald you have set T.koala back to Australia... 

Ferrum can refer to:
Iron, for which ferrum is the Latin term and the source of its chemical symbol Fe.[/font]

[Acca]

 
[size=0pt]http://www.overunity.com/8503/ultrasonic-piezonuclear-reactions/#.VY02XFKedBl[/size]


The energy piezonucleare is a hoax? Hundreds of researchers take sides "against". Someone also uses heavy words. But piezonucleare, the energy from the stones, presented by INRIM has remote origins. Although a little 'covered up.

A part of the world of Italian research was restless, and we hear the noise. In autoclaves science tricolor but it is felt that slow and steady sizzle yeast that "eats" the sugar, but a boil that reminds some noise of a pot of beans.

The world of Italian research is in fact boil for a "scandal" (or would) that has moved hundreds of researchers to sign a petition "against". Attention that even the famous "Tunnel Gelmini" one had been able to catalyze (a term more appropriate than ever for the topic that is going to treat).

Every scandal has a name, of course, and this time the word that seems to tear his clothes to hundreds of experts has strange similarities with the lighter flints and, for the less illiterate funzionali2 also with crystals of quartz clocks and many other electronic equipment that have a "clock".
The stone (piezonucleare) scandal.

The scandal comes in these terms: "piezonucleare", "energy piezonucleare", "nuclear piezoelectric". That is, in plain English, all ways to say that you can "get away" from nuclear power stones, literally.

And any stone, not only pitchblende or carnotite (ie minerals containing uranium) or perhaps remnants of MOX taken from the quarry boiling corio Fukushima (or Chernobyl). With the "piezonucleare" promises to produce "clean" energy thanks to the mere compression of these materials, mainly through "ultrasound".

In a sense, the '' energy piezonucleare "is the revenge of the" tombstone "by putting Science (with angular S, the Orthodox) on" cold fusion "of Fleischmann and Pons and" heirs ".

Now it seems that the same stone, but "piezonuclearmente", can provide energy. And speaking of stones, crystals and piezoelectric effects, in this "scandal" got to do right also "watches" and "measurements".

The scandal it was "turned on" by their 'INRIM3, namely the National Institute of Metrological Research, namely the' 'public research body, belonging to the Ministry of Education, University and Research "which" deals of measurement science and materials, it develops technologies and innovative devices. "

INRIM held a meeting on May 4 in Turin entitled "The atom unexplored. The hidden potential of cutting-edge research on nuclear technology" during which was presented to one hundred experts from around the world.4, a study on piezonuclear reaction.

"It 'a whole new field of research, called fission piezonucleare" said Alberto Carpinteri the conference, professor of structural engineering at the Turin Polytechnic and President INRIM. So much so that it does not exist "piezonucleare wikipedia" as they try in many.

The same Alberto Carpinteri explains: "We are considering nuclear phenomena hitherto considered 'illegal' and is opening a new phase of research."

In the conference in Turin it has been an experiment in front of everyone: a sample of Lucerne stone (a typical gneiss of Piedmont, the coverage of the Mole Antonelliana is made of this stone) has been compressed to the point of breaking, "releasing a quantity neutron 100 times higher than the natural background environmental ".

The discovery has implications of course someone might have already guessed, that, as pointed out by the same Carpinteri, the discovery of new precursors of earthquakes (and here one might reconnect to Gianpaolo Giuliani5) and even new models Carbon cycle .
But energy piezonucleare explodes the controversy. And Buffalo.

To continue research on piezonucleare, far away, even in the opinion of the discoverers, from industrial applications, clearly they need money.

Because so far the research on this line were made by Prof. Fabio Cardone6 with methods that recall the courage "unwise" (for personal safety) of Enrico Fermi and boys of Via Panisperna, so that the same Cardone thanks the "Divine Providence."

In a video of 2008, the professor says: "(...) we took risks unheard there we realized only at the end, because the guards were really at a minimum."

But the demand for loans by INRIM fission piezonucleare ago detonated a bomb instead of a controversy in the Italian research.

The answer to a fascinating research (and already present "in a nutshell" in literature scientifica7) is immediately "vaporized" by using an animal as a weapon capable, just as boron, of "poisoning" any reaction "nuclear" (also "alternative") : the hoax.

Immediately the "nuclear piezoelectric" is then branded a "hoax" and, to complete the warm reception, it is even nailed to the prefix "piezo" suffix "-poli", ie "Piezopoli" just as "Calciopoli", "Vallettopoli "and the mother of all" -poli ", ie" Tangentopoli ".

And so more than 750 researchers write an appeal to the Italian Ministry for Education, University and Research to "check if they match the true statements that you intend to put the priorities of the National Institute of Metrological Research (Inrim ) the study of the reactions piezonuclear ".
Percy Williams Bridgman already knew the phenomenon.

Yet the principle is not new and "strange" effects of the extreme compression of materials is something that goes back at least to the '30s.

A pioneer in this field was undoubtedly Percy Williams Bridgman, American physicist and philosopher of science, Nobel Prize for physics in 1946, who was responsible for its study of the physics of high pressures on materials and their thermodynamic effects. The implications of his findings have been so many and such that his research was "shelved" (curiously the term is interesting because of its quartz content), also for the interests of the long arm of the military, you know, for the nuclear research (especially for the strong nuclear force) have always had a soft spot.
Money for research or the pursuit of money?

In this regard, before you crucify INRIM and to feed the piezonucleare and his researchers to public ridicule of social networks, you do not even need to take in hand the complete works of Percy Bridgman, but just listen to the words of Professor Emilio Judge (physical, researcher of the National Institute of Nuclear Physics and the International Institute of Biophysics in Neuss) that tells exactly the story of Bridgman.

It is a "rare piece", not "mainstream", on this' online archive of Radio Radicale8. Emilio del Giudice speaks at a conference extremely interesting (than ignored by the media new and old) who was called symbolically "Money for research or the pursuit of money?" Organized by Sergio Noto and Laura Vantini, May 24, 2010 in Verona.

A conference, where intervened among others Michelangelo Hope, son of Homer and Speri9 "scorer machine power producer controlled thermonuclear with Piero Zorzi (patent 1974)." Homer Hope had arrived before Fleischmann and Pons in the "cold fusion" (before its time), that operated addiruttura a turbine (and an internal combustion engine) and had brevettata10 ("Manufacturer Energy Controlled Thermonuclear Hydrogen And His Isotopes" 11).

The words of Emilio del Giudice of 2010 are almost "precog" of the current situation.
The long arm of the military science.

Says Emilio del Giudice, quoting the book written in collaboration with Maurizio Torrealta (RaiNews24) "The Secret of the three bullets" (Edizioni Ambiente, 2012): "(...) Taking into account that a large number of scientists depends for its survival from benvolere the military authorities, or directly or indirectly (...) for example in the US the majority, in my day when I was in America in the '70s were two thirds, now do not know, however, it is always a good percentage of public funding of research funds the military. But even private ones in large part come from? They come from companies working for the Pentagon. So it is clear that in particular the military controls the entire system of honors or even newspaper and so on. It 'almost impossible to have a Nobel Prize if one is not well seen by the military. "
The strange case of physical "precarious" Giuseppe Goggles.

Judge continues: "I can cite an example of an Italian, Giuseppe Goggles which was professor in Milan who died some years ago, which was a great experimental physicist involved in two works that have had the Nobel: the discovery of positron and the discovery of Meson Pi, the pion. Facts. According to him because he was an anti-fascist, was exiled in England, and yet exile so precarious, so it could not be assumed, worked precariously in these labs, could not publish only His name, and then the articles that did were also signed by the manager who was Blacket in '32 when there was the work of the Positron and Powell in '47 when there was the work of the pion.

Both of these works were awarded the Nobel but were given to Blacket and Powell. Blacket was honest enough to say that he had nothing to do and that the work he had done Goggles. Then, what do you find? It turns out from the documents of the Nobel Foundation on behalf Goggles that there had been an explicit veto. Goggles because during the war did not cooperate to the company Atomic, because he said that he was anti-fascist did not mean he had to collaborate with the military Anglo-Americans, and then he went to Brazil, did not cooperate with the military, can not have the Nobel.

You understand that after all of these things if the military authorities, this topic is a topic that you do not need to know anything about, so why not you know nothing about, you have to say it's all a hoax, you have to say that those who study it are crooks, they are fools, even worse, stupid one can also keep it, are the crooks, who deserve to go to jail, they should be fired, and so on.

No one will dare, especially in times like now, when it is difficult to find a place, imagine a little a young man who wants to do her thesis on Cold Fusion, is a candidate to not immediately find work (...) and then everything is clear. "
The total silence on the "shocking" discovery of Percy Bridgman.

"In 1935 he appeared on Fisical Review an article written by a great American scientist Percy Bridgman - continues Emilio Del Giudice - who was then 10 years after the Nobel Prize, not for this article (" Effects of High Shearing Stress Combined with High Hydrostatic Pressure " 12, ed), but for the study of high pressure.

This article was shocking. He said he had felt that all solid bodies provided under growing pressure, longitudinal, ie crushing enough and after he had reached a shear stress, ie the hammer ... (Del Giudice imitates the sound of the hammer onomatopoeic, ed) pressed ... and then ... exceeded a threshold of the shear stress, the material is pulverized by emitting X-rays, electrons, in an explosion that seemed almost nuclear.

Here, and this was universal for all solid bodies, without exception. You will understand that in my opinion this is an interesting article that deserved comment, even to say 'wrong'. Surprise, this article published in December '35 in subsequent years no one mentions it, not even to say he was wrong, total silence. "
The discovery of Percy Bridgman had studied in military laboratories.

Continues Emilio Del Giudice: "Not even the same Bridgman recovered the argument, reproduced this result in a book he wrote after the war, brought him back, but nothing else. They spend many years and it turns out that the topic was studied in laboratories military. So the military laboratories were established: 'because we think that this discovery can eventually make a weapon, we do not want this issue to be further developed outside of us'.

So you see, there is an allegation that becomes self-censorship because scientists who depend on state funding for their existence not intentionally treat arguments that would impair their access to finance. And these arguments say: 'ah I'm not responsible, I do not deal with' (...).

And so, it is one of the triumphs of meritocracy. So now that will establish meritocracy can be sure that there will be no more heretics because everyone will want to be worthy, and so to be deserving must have the approval of others. "

In short, those who have ears to hear. The important thing is that on the "heretics" (and even Galileo was) not you put more, in 2012, a lid on it. It may emit neutrons.




Acca...
[size=0pt][/size]
[size=0pt][/size]

[PolandKapa]

What do you think about these circuit ? . I have all the necessary parts, only with a capacitor can be a problem, but I can always make my own. At the moment there didn't wrote the exact parameters, I do not know them. I will modifying project during construction.