Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Light is converted gravity

Started by brian334, July 02, 2009, 06:46:31 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

newbie123

Until you can measure it, arguing about something can be many things.. But science is not one of them.

gravityblock

Quote from: Dave45 on July 06, 2009, 11:13:19 PM
Great read makes sense to me, I wonder if a magnate motor could be made this way.

If nature is doing it, then I don't see why we can't do it also.  Before we can emulate nature, we have to know how she is doing it first.

Cotterell's link could answer a lot of questions that the currently accepted model of the atom does not, due to possible flaws in their model for the atom.  I have to be careful with the words I use, cause things are easily taken out of context here.

The neutron could be where science went wrong in modeling the atom correctly.


Thanks Dave,


GB


*Disclaimer, please do your own research in what I say and decide for yourself if it is correct or not.  <---- I shouldn't need this, most people already know this.  LOL
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

gravityblock

Check out newbie's profile, then view his posts and you'll see the same pattern continue.  This guy is nothing but a distraction and nuisance where ever he goes in this forum.  No doubt that he is a Troll.  I apologize to all for doing this, but this stuff needs to stop.  It is not my intention on derailing this thread.  I am only trying to have a discussion that is on-topic here, but that is impossible to do with a Troll running wild.

I fell for the trap and went off-topic.  I became a distraction myself and derailed this thread, like he wanted.

Sorry,


GB
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

Dave45

I consider myself a neutral observer with no formal physics training and if you put the two theory's side by side the Velcro theory fails miserably I mean come on the velcro would implode and explode at the same time.
Does mainstream science expect everyone to follow this bullshit, the blind leading the blind.
The negative and positive neutrino seems far more plausible.

exnihiloest

Quote from: brian334 on July 02, 2009, 06:46:31 PM

Light travels at the speed of light.
How long does it take light to accelerate to
the speed of light?
...

Light doesn't accelerate. It exists only at light speed and is created by quanta actions in matter.

If light accelerated then its wave length would be dependant on the distance from the source. This has never been observed.