Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



German Scientist Posts Complete Free Energy Documentation Online

Started by tomd000, July 04, 2009, 06:50:54 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.


Xaero_Vincent

Flathunter,

There can be a connection with Dr. Turtur's electrostatic vacuum energy rotors but we can only make that determination if the PFT mk2 works in a high vacuum and measures a net energy gain. Mr. Turtur's rotors had a COP in the range of 30 to 52. With some further optimization of the machine and a higher vacuum, an even higher COP might be attainable. Of course, once an electrical generator is hooked to the rotor via a driveline shaft and electronics to convert power to 60Hz 120VAC, there will be some efficiency losses that bring down the COP value a bit.

A glass vacuum desiccator will work but the vacuum achieved probably won't be enough to make a measurement. Dr. Turtur worked in chambers at a pressure in the magnitude of 10 ^ -4 and 10 ^ -5 mbar. This was the pressure needed to make extremely low current measurements with a pico ampere meter with a voltage potential of 16 - 30 kV. By extremely low current I mean in the range of 80 - 100 femtoamps.

In order for a power generating machine to be kept at a reasonable size, extremely high voltage potentials in the range of 1 - 10+ Megavolts will be required. By reasonable I mean a machine in a vacuum chamber 40 - 50 ft diameter at pressure of 10 ^ -8 Torr or better and maybe 10 Megavolts of potential at the field source. Such a machine might generate 13 - 27 horsepower (10 - 20 kW) before generator and power conversion losses.

Mr. Turtur and I both agree that the high cost of a vacuum environment and low power output from conversion of vacuum energy will limit the success of this technology--at least on Earth. Its a different story in space, where vacuum exists freely.

Anyway, the point I was making is that a powerful machine will require extreme electrostatic potential with minimal leakage losses. That translates into the need for a very good vacuum, perhaps even in the range of ultra-high vacuum like deep space. Cheap garage vacuum pumps won't do unfortunately.

Xaero_Vincent

Nice videos flathunter. Thing spins fast. :D

Where did you get the power supply?

Arching represents a complete electrical breakthrough of air. Ion wind and current loss occur at voltages far below complete electrical breakthrough. This obviously means that the efficiency of the PFT motor in air is low.

Atmospheric electricity is a cool idea but I think you might run into trouble with a high-altitude balloon connected to a wire. A popped balloon means the wire will fall and potentially hit a utility line. That wouldn't be good heh.

I think grounded poles with sharp tips (similar to lightening rods) with a tiny bit of radioactive isotope to induce ionization current through the pole is the real solution. Be aware that the resulting power is high voltage and I think its a unsteady modulating DC current.

flathunter

Hi Vincent,

I got the power supply from http://www.amazing1.com/

You're right concerning a ballon - i suppose it depends where you live.  If i manage to buy a house next year I may have to go with your suggestion of grounded poles - radioactive tips sounds good!  But for the moment I've got to wait ....i'm trying to keep up with the Don Smith thread at the moment, as its a project which I can play with in my tiny flat.  Nonetheless, i wont be forgetting about my PFT or Dr Turtur (or my first inspiration for becoming a hobby scientist - Mr Naudin) - so please keep me informed on your own experiments and Dr Turturs.  I'll certainly respond with great interest.

Be Lucky in all your experiments - We all know how much the world needs some intelligent free energy solutions in these troubled times.

Xaero_Vincent

Thanks for the link.

I'll certainly keep everyone informed on my experiments with vacuum energy rotors. Since its impossible to achieve a COP > 1 with the rotors in air, I won't be conducting many more experiments until I can afford a vacuum pump and build a chamber, which also isn't cheap.

I'm also interested in the elemental rod generators. I'll be working on this too. If they are real then a replication can be as simple as two rods mounted to a piece of plywood with a switch. Of course not just any metal will work for the rods.