German Scientist Posts Complete Free Energy Documentation Online

[the_big_m_in_ok]

I keep getting a damaged file message.

I just loaded and ran the file in Reply #2 successfully.  If I had had that problem in the past, going to a bigger computer and/or working a faster throughput data line often cured the problem.

I'm on a relatively new computer at a State University in San Francisco.

--Lee

[Xaero_Vincent]

Here's a photo of my electrostatic motors.

The unit with triangle shaped blades is made of aluminium foil and covered with duct tape to reduce static discharge. The paper model is shown sitting next to the larger metal rotor on the plywood base. During actual testing the paper model is nowhere near the metal rotor.

Both shown motors spin from the power of a charged balloon held above the blades. However the paper model spins faster and longer.

[flathunter]

Looking good there vincent!!!

Great to see some progress.  Thanks a million for the links to earth antennaes - i wont be able to try it for a good few months - i live in a flat at the moment, but i'm hoping to buy some land next year, and then try and get some volts from the sky, and get that motor running freely.

[Xaero_Vincent]

Thanks flathunter.

Your replication of the PFT mk2 motor is looking nice as well. May I suggest you try operating it inside a vacuum chamber. If it spins in a evacuated chamber with extremely small power loss then this motor might be worth a further look. I mentioned this motor to Dr. Turtur and he too is interested in testing it in a vacuum chamber.

I've been in contact with Dr. Turtur over the last couple weeks. He answered all my questions and cleared up the believability issues for me. I'm now very confident of his results obtained from the electrostatic rotor inside the vacuum. We also discussed the magnetic analogue of the rotor using diamagnetic and paramagnetic rotor material and a permanent or electromagnet; ferromagnetic material is unlikely to work. Unlike the electrostatic rotor, he hasn't yet achieved success with the magnetic analogue because easily obtainable permanent magnets possess too high of an inhomogeneous field to permit continuous rotation and electromagnets require a lot of power and waste a great deal of it to heat.

I'm currently working on a magnetic rotor myself and haven't witnessed success either. These experiments are being done in the meantime, while I save up for a powerful turbo molecular vacuum pump to perform experiments with the successful electrostatic rotors. Dr. Turtur made it very clear that he never achieved "overunity" results with the electrostatic vacuum energy rotor while operated in air because ions will cause an electric current and generate unacceptable power loss, even at voltages less than 1 kV. A high or ultra-high vacuum (as in space) is required to ever witness a net energy gain.

[flathunter]

Thanks for the reply Vincent.  Really pleased to hear you've been in contact with Dr Turtur, and very happy that he's interested in the Poynting Flow Thruster.  Like I said in another post, I think his experiment is very relevant to Naudins PFT projects.  Unfortunately I dont have any vacuum chambers handy (would a vacuum desicator do? or is it not powerful enough to get a decent vacuum? I've used these before at university, and i know they are simple enough for a guy like me to get working )  Anyway, I've made a couple of videos if you're interested, of my PFT:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6bSjSnMMo0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smSTEkezHuQ

Thanks again for the info on atmospheric generators.  Cant wait to get a house with some land and try some! Like you say, energy from the vacuum or not, this is FREE ENERGY (hooray!)