Free Energy and social consequences

[Ilya Stavinsky]

Why the governments of the developed countries are against of Free Energy sources, because
Free Energy will dramatically reduce our dependency on working people and increase the productivity in our society by tenfolds. In reality all those problems created by introduction of Free Energy: millions of unemployed people who will lose their jobs in sectors producing oil, coal, electricity etc. and in sectors which directly or indirectly connected with them; conflict of interest for rich people, who control those branches of productions - can be solved within the frame of the capitalist society without stepping on somebody’s toes among the rich people…. The future form of this capitalist society is called “Social capital” and described in the book “Capitalism today and Capitalism tomorrow”.
sites.google.com/site/socialcapital1/Home

[TechStuf]

The world is toast.  Those watching us from high above can clearly see that our leaders are a malignant mass of self deceived arch villains.  I fully expect their intervention before the "cretins that be" succeed in destroying all life on the planet via any of a number of devious technologies being currently toyed with at the expense of the remnant of sane people on the planet.


Pay attention,


It's about to get (even more) crazy down here.  For a moment.



God bless

[Cloxxki]

If all those people get unemployed, who's going to sell me a free energy water heater, a free energy electrical power generator and a free energy car upgrade kit?

[Ilya Stavinsky]

The point is that unemployment problem and conflict of interest for rich people who will lose their wealth as the result of introduction of Free Energy, can be solved by the capitalist society in the form of the "Social Capital". Under social capital rich people will be interested consciously to raise productivity of the social labour and for this reason they will be interested in introducing new technology, including Free Energy. You will find explanation for this metamorphose in the book "Capitalism today and capitalism tomorrow". It is the only book on the market that describes scientifically this transition  for capitalist society.

[Alien509]

I don't know what would be a negative social consequence for the rich. The only thing that would happen is the standard of living for everyone would be better. If anything more people could become "rich", "rich" completely becomes an oxymoron under a free energy society. Free energy solves war for energy- it does not stop the need for people to work to have. The efficiencies such as computer technologies will (and for the most part have) already eliminated the need for most work. Just look at the production capabilities of any facility, they far exceed the demand. In all honesty the social consequences mirror the current state of any typical day anyhow. We all drive our cars, use our boats, cook, chat on computers, play golf (or some other sport) and occasionally sip martinis. What it does is solve one of the largest ideological discrepancies that ever existed. The only thing left after free energy is Greed. When we need to produce we can, if we don't, then why bother? Money is only a useful tool when it actually has value. If we can not consume the goods we produce then money is not useful. twenty, million dollar homes sitting empty isn't very useful. Neither is 50 trillion dollars of supply that sits idle for years. This is one way of measuring the utility of money. When people are laid off the value of the money they posses should increase and they idealistically should be paid their pay checks even if they are not working. Furthermore advances in science and technologies rise when the challenges are faced. It is poor character to avoid the potential for advancement because of fear and it usually results in the most regrettable outcomes.