Thane Heins BI-TOROID TRANSFORMER

[taleo]

We need more videos like these where it's the results are clear cut: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXno_7xXSZs

However if it was shorter and concise it would be better. Nonetheless great for proving that it works and understanding the calculations.

[gyulasun]

Real OU with bi-toroid transformer, not a measurement errors ? Anyone ?

We need more videos like these where it's the results are clear cut: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tXno_7xXSZs

However if it was shorter and concise it would be better. Nonetheless great for proving that it works and understanding the calculations.

Hi Folks,

Here is a test with measurements,  10 minute long video with English subtitles:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j-dZj4-PU9s

Gyula

[taleo]

Thanks for the video Gyula. It's an interesting counter evident find. I'm waiting on my scope meter to arrive so I can do the same test. But as a raw test with an LC meter, the impedance of my primary increases when I short my two secondaries. On a normal transformer it goes close to zero so it raises my eyebrow.

[leonardocunha]

Hello, everyone!!
Power Companies CAN CHARGE us for using excessive REACTIVE POWER (resulted from low Power Factor devices).
https://www.npower.com/business/help-and-support/customer-information/reactive-power/
https://www.psoklahoma.com/info/news/ReactivePowerCharge.aspx

Do this mean that Bi-Toroid Transformer (by Thane Heins) and other similar OU devices will INCREASE our electric bill?
Here in Brazil, consuming excessive Reactive Power even represents penalty.
My intention on replicating BiTT (PF = zero) was for reducing my power billing, not opposite.
Reactive Power can not be measured by Wattmeter (kW), but Companies measure it by other way (kVAR).
Is there a way for overcome this? Or do I just misunderstood all those things?


Put new topic for this discussion:
http://overunity.com/15983/reactive-power-bill/msg459456/#msg459456

[TheHERETIC]

I am thinking of making a higher powered BITT from off the shelf materials.
Is there any reason why this idea wont work.
I may change it to have one thin cut right through the middle leg to halp the BH curve be more linear.
But this is the basic idea.
C:\My files\FE\BITT\bitt draw1.jpg

if you are thinking those cutouts will help the CEMF from finding its way back to the P.. that might work... but in practical application you may find that the fact that all coils are on the same EM plane it will probably induce through the air enough to make up for those cutouts... you could use just a tiny bit of that Over-U by winding some take-up coils in the secondary paths and run them in series to some counter-lentz control coils wound around your cutouts... lemme see if i can illustrate what im describing...

you might also try shifting planes as well... lets say you are placing all the coils on the X plane pointing Y... pivot the primary along the X 90 degrees to point Z... then you can add 2 more secondaries into the Y pointing X... can you see that in your mind? again i think i need to sketch it out in 3D.