Magnetic Resonance Devices based on Don Smith Concepts

[Peterae]

@Yucca

Now i know i am not strong on theory but when i think about the way the secondary is wired in parallel and then think about a conventional transformers secondary then i would imagine that they are subtractive and the net result would be very little output.
If he used 2 20 turn secondaries and wired as per a conventional transformer secondary we would get double the current, so i wonder if he has made a mistake in the drawing after all he does show 2 separate secondaries not 1.
My guess is that he is trying to receive 2 units of energy for every 1 unit he puts in less losses.

Peter

[Peterae]

OR

Even more interesting is the position of the center tap, in the circuit he shows the top half of the secondary is 1.29 times the size of the bottom half of the secondary.

Peter

[xenomorphlabs]

@Yucca

Now i know i am not strong on theory but when i think about the way the secondary is wired in parallel and then think about a conventional transformers secondary then i would imagine that they are subtractive and the net result would be very little output.
If he used 2 20 turn secondaries and wired as per a conventional transformer secondary we would get double the current, so i wonder if he has made a mistake in the drawing after all he does show 2 separate secondaries not 1.
My guess is that he is trying to receive 2 units of energy for every 1 unit he puts in less losses.

Peter

Peter, in one of his lectures Smith states that the part (half) of his secondary with the shunt has the function to get a better "signal" and the tap itself is supposed to provide a negative output/electron inrush path into the circuit (the factor that makes the amperage).

He repeatedly emphasises the center tap as the amperage-factor in his lectures/literature and points to the center tap in the NST as well as the center tap in the receiver coil and also the center tap in the output transformer coil.

The amplitudes of current and voltage are probably dependant on nodes/antinodes which have a specific position at resonance (at the ends and in the middle)
as well as other physical conditions inside the secondary circuit.

Even more interesting is the position of the center tap, in the circuit he shows the top half of the secondary is 1.29 times the size of the bottom half of the secondary.

I have noticed that too, it is as if he wants to indicate an asymetric voltage divider.
However we have to keep in mind that Smith/Tesla/Marks etc. all want to deceive replicators .

[Peterae]

Same old problem, shame the photos don't show where the center tap really is or at least verify the coil configuration. 

Still i guess it's possible to try the different configs

[xenomorphlabs]

Same old problem, shame the photos don't show where the center tap really is or at least verify the coil configuration. 

Still i guess it's possible to try the different configs

Maybe these 2 pics show it better? It actually looks to me like an exact center tap, which would make most sense antinode-wise.

Ah and to prevent any confusion, there is NO accurate schematic for the table device.
The schematics found in the pdfs differ from that device in some ways.

Are you intending to replicate exactly that table device?