Selfrunning 3 KWatts ERR unit powering 3 x 800 Watt lamps

[Harvey]

@Tk
you mentioned the D word (Dennis) wash your mouth out with soap.
I think the Rod's are a dead duck. Lets face it...if there were 74 elements in it you don't have to be Einstein to figure out there is something pretty hot in there with a reasonable half life.
However for the latest device in a box I am very interested to see what is really driving that.
@Harvey
I am happy to go to the phillipines to view the said device including signing an NDA and leaving the video camera behind. There are a lot of red flags from the video demo I saw, however there are somethings I am curious about. My main specialty has been as mentioned before hydrogen injection and as a hobby following magnetic motors.
I have doubts that it is tuned to the earths frequencies (I could be wrong) but the materials used may act as a capicitor or battery.
Mark

Rods = DeadDuck 

When the device is available for public viewing you may well be among the first to see it. Those involved are working hard to ensure that this will not be suppressed in any way. I imagine they will seek UL certification prior to public access to it.

[Harvey]

The Vortex list discussion is interesting.

http://www.mail-archive.com/vortex-l@eskimo.com/msg33518.html

There will always be misunderstandings surrounding written and spoken phrases. I know your education is well 'grounded' in science but it does not imply a physical wired connection. The use of the term is obvious in the context, has already been explained by myself in a prior post and the taking of exception of it is where the real misdirection exists.

Ask yourself this TK...what were you working on when you fell into the "Nowhere Man" project? Why have we kept you busy on other things all these years? 

[TinselKoala]

Ok, that's what I thought. I wanted to make certain that the rods were not being promoted in any way by NARF.

Let's see: the 6-rod in the plastic case appears in the Japanese brochure for Schwartz's ERR Corp. And it is featured at the top of Sterling's page on these devices. And I do recall seeing it on a NARF page, although the link doesn't work for me now. But OK, if you want to imply that I am not correct in associating Schwartz with the rods device, that's your prerogative. It's wrong, of course, but you have that privilege.

And if you are implying that I have been deliberately distracted to prevent me from applying my vaunted debunking powers and enormous intellect to projects like Schwartz's, then you've been reading Rosemary's verbiage for far too long.

[lltfdaniel1]

Let's see: the 6-rod in the plastic case appears in the Japanese brochure for Schwartz's ERR Corp. And it is featured at the top of Sterling's page on these devices. And I do recall seeing it on a NARF page, although the link doesn't work for me now. But OK, if you want to imply that I am not correct in associating Schwartz with the rods device, that's your prerogative. It's wrong, of course, but you have that privilege.

And if you are implying that I have been deliberately distracted to prevent me from applying my vaunted debunking powers and enormous intellect to projects like Schwartz's, then you've been reading Rosemary's verbiage for far too long.

Shame if i knew how a overunity device worked...i'd explain it all..and even the techniques...because all it takes is some misunderstanding.

[Harvey]

It just gets more and more interesting.

We are agreed that the elemental rods are in the direct lineage of the Schwartz device, right?

Well, it looks like Stefan has been aware of this story for a while:
http://freenrg.fr/JapRod/Rodgen2.htm


And as if that's not enough, it appears that there is some kind of link with Dennis Lee. The one linked video seems to be missing, but there's another one in the same ucsofa directory that contains the same stuff, if you can stand to watch Dennis perform. He shows the "original" video at 1:45, and says that he (Dennis) has been showing this since 1997.
http://www.ucsofa.com/videos/case2.rm

This is one place we definitely disagree. The rods are not part of the ERR lineage. They may both be radiation reception devices, but then so are solar panels, TV antennas and a whole list of other devices common to all. The only connection between these two is Dr. Schwartz. His foundation has no negative association with it, and your inference here that it does borders on libel. As far as Dennis goes, I've never met the person nor am I personally familiar with any negative association therewith. I have seen many negative posts regarding this person, like the one above and I simply ignore them. What exactly was there in that video you linked to that you found objectionable?