Back to Basics

[sparks]

   There is ambient energy to be harvested so how can we put together a simple device and I mean simple that will convert it into what appears as overunity.  Something a fifth grader with an attention span of 30 seconds will be interested in and understand. 

[Grumpy]

   There is ambient energy to be harvested so how can we put together a simple device and I mean simple that will convert it into what appears as overunity.  Something a fifth grader with an attention span of 30 seconds will be interested in and understand.

The "ambient energy" as you call it, is dependent on other waves for it's existence.  It is"dynamic" and does not sit idle and wait for us to use it like a capacitor or battery.  A few people have developed antennas and recievers that appear to recieve energy from the "universe".  Something put that energy in motion, be it a pulsar, our sun, a multitude of astral bodies, or GOD himself.

Look at Tesla's simple radiant energy collectors - a copper plate, gap, cap, and ground.  Has anyone ever considered that this might be a basic starting point and that it can be enhanced to receive much more energy?  No. That might require us to "think" or "work".

Perhaps some will look at them with a different perspective.  Ten forms of energy with the same properties are probably the same damn thing.

[Grumpy]

Considering there are about 6.788 billion people on the earth, it's very irresponsible statement. 

We are an irresponsible species.

Since you replied, how might the Tesla Radiant Energy Receivers be "enhanced"?

If I compress a region of space (requires HV negative impulses) above the receiver plate, will it increase the apperture of the receiver (make it appear "larger") and recieve more RE from "space"?

If I place a gravity field coil (the one that ShadowHawk shared a couple of decades ago) between the receiver plate and "space", and "enhance" gravity in the region above the plate, will I receive more RE?

[Grumpy]

I so hate that word : RE. Could you tell me please what is RE? Radiant Energy? What does it mean? Do you know, or just use that fancy word, as everybody else. How we want to force a copper atom's (in that example) to supply more energy for us, if we don't know how one single atom working, how absorb and radiate energy in the first place. What happening when we overload the atomic lattice bond in the copper with capacitor discharge? For god sake, we manipulating atom's every day, using them to transfer energy from point to point, we have to somehow simplify down enough (2 atom in a covalent bond) our thinking, examples, to understand how energy transferred, received, radiated by the mass.

Sure, you will. A lot more. 1 RE, 2RE, 3RE etc...   

Don't take that post as an offense, but it's really pathetic, if i read back 1-2 years, same things happened here, as right now. Linking pdf's, books, talking about everything using fancy words, which nobody exactly understand, and know what the *** is that, and generating more and more confusion from time to time. I realized already, that's how open forums work. In the end I could ask myself, wtf I'am doing here?  Nowdays I think i have more fun, as I learn here.

"Radiant Energy" is whatever is charging the capacitor in Tesla Radiant Energy Receiver:

Nikola Tesla - Method of Utilizing Radiant Energy - US Patent 685958

I am just asking if anyone took this and tried to understand it, or improve it.  Obviously no one has given it more than a passing glance.

[Grumpy]

Obviously no one in the universe. It's so sad.   

That is the point I was trying to make, as well as to plant some "idea seeds" in anyone bothering to read my post.

What if this "radiant energy", pooring down in an endless supply from Heaven, can be collected in a different way, and made "practical"?

Any thoughts related to this, Chef?