New invention of motion less generation of electric power

[Omega_0]

in our test i will not use watt meter the video was to show a lay man that less energy is consumed
for technical peoples measurements and numbers are good enough to establish results.
regards
Ali

Winson Ali,

That's a very good decision indeed. As suggested by someone earlier, the best way is to feed from a DC source and measure input DC power. Use an inverter to feed your device.
At the output, rectify the output and again measure the output power in a resistive DC load.

That's it ...

Any more theoretical speculation is not necessary at this time. If these measurement results are overunity, you will have unlimited finances to proceed. Please take a break from the forum, if you need time.

[hartiberlin]

P:S:

Again at the example with the bathtube:

If you would arrange the hose above the bathtube at 3 Meters height
for example of 100 loops of the hose , then you would
have a lot of water up there 3 Meters over the bathtube at the start when you
suck the air out of the hose and not much water had run down the hose yet.

So the question is, if sucking the air out of the hose uses less energy than the potential
energy of the water 3 Meters higher in the 100 loops of the hose ?

If the answer is YES , you could make a valve into the hose and
shut it up, when the whole 100 loops are full of water and have
that potential of water do more work, when it is released and
will fall down in the gravity field.

[allcanadian]

@winsonali
Quote:
"Now with in the device the switching is in a very specific way, causes a resonance and more charges aligning themselves then in a conventional manner 
telling you truly when i was conducting these tests i was knowing that charges are there but they are not in flow and i have to find a way to make them flow or convert them as workable PD(potential difference )"

Congratulations on your success, I think you understand the dilema you find yourself in as well, LOL. How do you explain something so obvious, so basic to people who have no conception of what you are talking about without giving everything away? I was building these circuits many years ago and they work very well but there are bottlenecks or rather limitations which I am sure you are aware of. You have made a very good first step getting past this current-centric perception everyone seems to be stuck in and I think you will really enjoy where this will lead you. For the record this is not a new concept---it is a very old one and the issues you are having concerning conversion were resolved by Nicola Tesla in his early patents.
Regards
AC

[robbie47]

I was building these circuits many years ago and they work very well but there are bottlenecks or rather limitations which I am sure you are aware of.

Allcanadian, can you post some more details of the circuits that you tried earlier?

[hartiberlin]

Can anyone imagine,
how ALI´s digital oscillator with resonance works ?
Does he have some kind of CCD chain switched by Mosfets
with a positive feedback loop ?

Does he have the bulb load inside the positive feedback loop,
so the charges are raised in potential and can flow back from the output of the CCD chain to the
lower potential at the input of the CCD chain ?

If you compare it with an Audio delay echo unit, where they have also CCDs
for the delay line, if you feed back too much audio into the input,
then there is a resonance and the delay line will work like an oscillator..

He said, it always needs to see a load and I guess it must be something like this,
otherwise there would be no "siphon" effect.

Regards, Stefan.