New Moon photos , do they really show the Apollo landing gear ?

[utilitarian]

Also,
who is the other guy without moon suit,who picks up stuff
from the ground at 0:51 in this video ?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gfHwQGb40fk

Do you think, that is just faked ?

Yes, this video is faked.  Why does it only have 3000 hits on youtube, and no one seems to ever bring up this evidence anywhere?  Even the very serious moon landing hoax websites never mention this.

With regard to the astronaut getting up with apparently the help of wires, look carefully.  The other astronaut, who is already standing, assists the fallen astronaut with his right hand, which the fallen astronaut takes with his left hand.  In 1/6 gravity, it is easy to help a fallen person get up, as shown in the video, and the effect you see is just that. 

I know it seems odd that the fallen astronaut gets up without using his knees or really pushing against the ground in any way, but that is because he is pushing against the hand of his companion.

[hartiberlin]

@utilitarian

I disagree with you, but okay, it is your right to have a different view.

There are other youtube videos, where you can see it better,
how the astronaut is pulled up via the hookup wires, but I don´t find it right now.

Regards, Stefan.

[WilbyInebriated]

Yes, this video is faked.  Why does it only have 3000 hits on youtube, and no one seems to ever bring up this evidence anywhere?  Even the very serious moon landing hoax websites never mention this.

this is a logical fallacy. how many hits the video may or may not have has no bearing on whether or not it is fake...

[utilitarian]

this is a logical fallacy. how many hits the video may or may not have has no bearing on whether or not it is fake...

One, do you think the moon landing was faked?  I am just curious if you have an actual position, or if you are just here to accuse me of logical fallacies.  I know, I know, irrelevant, right?  You hold no positions, you just look for random logical fallacies.

Two, an unpopular video is a sign of the video not being interesting to people.  If the video was genuine, it would be very interesting, but if most people regarded this as a fake, they would not bother linking to it, as it is not noteworthy in that sense.  So there is the logical tie in.

But thank you for your vigilant eye for logical fallacies.  Not on Wilby's watch!!!

[onthecuttingedge2005]

we know that probes are sent up to space on a common basis, a manned ship has been sent to space for decades, once your in space it takes very little fuel to get to the moon and back, it is very dangerous up there especially if you're a quarter of a million miles a way from home, disaster lingers at the distance.(fact)

radiation was not a problem for the astronauts and there are numbers to prove it and I did illustrate the numbers of dosages from the Van Allen Belt, 4 standard X-Rays a day if you remain in the Van Allen Belt(unshielded), this is equivalent to less than one PET scan per 24 hour period.(fact).

It is easier to land on the moon and less dangerous than it is landing on the Earth. (fact).

I see no logical reason at all why we could not of traveled to the Moon. all the numbers are real and present, the rockets fuel to weight ratio's were all correct, the food, water, oxygen were all correct ratio's.

make a list of 'why' we could not of 'traveled' and landed on the moon and I will find the numbers and post them.

Jerry