Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



New Moon photos , do they really show the Apollo landing gear ?

Started by hartiberlin, August 26, 2009, 11:18:44 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Doug1

Roster tails of dust would be easy to create that would fall slower then normal dirt or dust. Just pick the right type of particulates which have very little weight and are not inert.

Staffman

Although the Hubble Telescope has really good resolution, it is limited. The link below explains the math behind why we can not use Hubble to see the moon landing. The smallest thing it could see on the moon is 124 meters across.

http://sm3a.gsfc.nasa.gov/messages/676.html

The same goes for a camera in orbit around the moon. They could put the camera in a closer orbit to achieve better resolution but, that would use up more fuel decreasing the mission lifetime.

Maybe a bunch of smaller telescopes linked up (interferometry) could accomplish this from earth?

hartiberlin

By the way, what happened with the Japanese
KAGUYA (SELENE) spacecraft ?

Did it ever made a video of the NASA landing sites, while flying over it and
good was the resolution ?

Did it finally crash into the moon ?

I did not follow up on this and am curious,
if the Japanese agency released any good photos
of the Nasa landing sites.

Regards, Stefan.
Stefan Hartmann, Moderator of the overunity.com forum

FatBird

Here is ABSOLUTE PROOF they did NOT go to the moon!!!!

=====================

Part 1.  A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nOMHSgQuuiw


Part 2.  A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fTd9XjvWxCw


Part 3.  A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8QsgdXMUtdA


Part 4.  A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BdXtRpCsjp0


Part 5.  A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=crqbdjybYeE


.

utilitarian

Quote from: Doug1 on November 29, 2009, 06:46:45 AM
Roster tails of dust would be easy to create that would fall slower then normal dirt or dust. Just pick the right type of particulates which have very little weight and are not inert.

You completely miss the point of the rooster tails of dust.  The point is not that dust particles fall slowly, but that they fall quickly, and do not linger in the air, like they should, if there was an atmosphere.  Absent a huge vacuum chamber, you cannot recreate this effect on earth.