New Moon photos , do they really show the Apollo landing gear ?

[Schpankme]

No,No listen they have been far into space. We have been left out in the cold. UFOs are seen around the world, way to many to come from anywhere but Earth. I'd say millions of sighting are proof enough. Then we go to the other topic, a few fake pictures and a few shaky accounts of aliens. There is no proof of Aliens. a is an economically suppressed area the little thing he let out was he was aware of the fact because it is so by design.

raburgeson,

All your previous posts read exactly the same: the government is out to get you/us; they really 'did it' we got proof, their just hiding the proof from you; your tax dollars pay for technology they won't show you, and have you seen any UFO's lately.

You sound like a government dis-informer.

Schpankme

"No human has ever left the safety of low earth orbit."

[raburgeson]

I haven't seen anything except a chemtrail fog around here. You can't even see planes that land at the airport. Tell me what's up with that?

I don't want to see the taxpayer saddled with payments to a place that produces lies. A 1970 U2 carried a 4 gigabyte camera. Tell me they sent less on any of these probes they have sent into space. What do we get? Mars pictures that have 30 or 40 shots sewed together that are 2 megs? Oh Hubble can't take a picture of the moon or mars, they are too close. What a lie. And equal lie is the Hubble Earth pictures on the net and that's closer to Hubble. I'm not disinforming I'm exposing and they will not lie out of it. They have been lying over 5 decades and I'm calling a halt to it.

Go to google and search Hubble Earth images, go get them quick before they disappear now that I mention they exist. How do they land a probe in an atmosphere. They use parachutes right, specially in the old days. I'll tell you what they told us about Venus. They told us Venus has a molten surface and extreme atmospheric temperatures. So extreme that a parachute would not survive and they would never have probed Venus at all. Then go look up the reflectivity of the atmosphere of Venus. It wouldn't be hot there. Then look at the chemtrails again. They have many uses, they form a capacitive affect in the atmosphere. Do you have any education about wave guides? Right now they are shaking over what I had to say about their chemtrails. Here's what I am going to tell you about them today, the people involved with the atmospheric spraying are involved with treason. When I reported the sky was a bright white frost that was as white as the snow for three weeks we got our first 3 days of sunshine this year. The period from the 27 of December till the time of my posting on chemtrail central we spent weeks not even being able to tell where the sun was. They are getting right back to the same crap right now. The only machines you can see around here are the 2 ambulance choppers that fly below the blanket of chemicals we are covered with. In the mean time we have a bunch of scientists that never work with their own data. Not one of them is working with a picture of the moon they took. That's not a theory that's a fact. And here is another fact, a group of scientists were set down to a picture that had pieces of petrified wood in them and not one of these could identify the wood even after they were asked about wood. To get the research and grant money these guys are willing to play any game the government wants to play. I've had it with those type of people and it's time we back them into the corner and get the truth out of them.

Me scared of them? No way, cockroaches crawl for a dark crack to hide in soon as you turn on the light.

Just listen to them, CO2 is a greenhouse gas, Mars has a CO2 rich atmosphere. Mars is cold and has only got ice and no running water. We are given some mixed signals here, why doesn't information released from the government ever add up?

Check this out

http://www.bautforum.com/showthread.php/92683-Moon-rock-in-Dutch-museum-is-just-petrified-wood

This comes a few years after what I was talking about above.
They were caught lying about global warming. A world wide lie was exposed. That's not a theory. That is a prime example of falsified scientific data and total abandonment of scientific method.

[raburgeson]

Alright, I have been here a long time, let's do a lucrative small project. I assure you this time will be very productive. First pick up this image.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cydonia_%28region_of_Mars%29

Copy and paste this into your address bar. Go get it quick before it's replaced or deleted. It's the original face on Mars picture. You know the one I'm talking about. The picture that has caused worthless controversy for four decades and held back science. It is a gray scale gif file. That is not suitable for analysis. I will give you a copy here in case anything happens to the original. Oh, they already changed it. Alright let's do this one together but, let me show you the original and this copy has to be easy to find at other places. Let me bore you with the old one for a few minutes. I changed it this way. I opened the gif with paintshop pro and increased the color depth to 16 million colors, then saved it as a JPEG. The I increased image size to 600 in photoshop. So I went from this to this.

I will make a new post to continue for the increased size and it's analysis. You can right click these and recreate my work as we go along.

[raburgeson]

OK, upsized we get this, Photoshop reproduces images faithfully. Changed from a gray scale we can spray light films of color on it. Just highlight it so you can see the original lines beneath. It comes out like this. Download these and zoom in so you can see the details.

A quicky on their abstract art. There are small figures that fit together to make larger figures. Look these over. They clearly show there is no room left for a pixel from space. There are layers of art on one layer of sublimes. I'll make a new post for further analysis of the (face).

[raburgeson]

Here are some more images associated with the face. You don't believe they would do this to you? When I first found this stuff I didn't either. That's what made it better hidden. Let's find out who said the thing about hid in plain site, who said that. You will notice the small red highlighted figure in the one picture and the yellow figure in the dark area. If you ferret out the image just one size larger you will notice it becomes and arm that's cl;uching the neck, the head for this is just above the yellow figure. You should be able to work that out just looking at it right here at the post.

Once you get familiar with their art you can do this all day long to images from NASA, JPL, ESA, Japan and anywhere else space pictures come from. It get's boring fast. I didn't bother to do it but, if anyone would like to change the gray area to all the same gray and play connect the black dots that may produce something interesting too.