Dr. Eugene Jeong

[PaulLowrance]

Oh, I forgot, the EE (by profession) that discovered that piezos produce current & voltage built an elaborate testing setup that used reed relays. His data graphs were published at my website where his piezo produced over 3 volts.
It's not due to the switch. IMO ~ two years of experiments has ruled out all known effects.

Paul

[PaulLowrance]

To add the to the above list of evidence, diodes and piezo have been tested without a switch, just connecting the diode or piezo directly to an electrometer inside metal shielding. EE's, physicists, and I have done this, and diodes & piezos produce DC current & voltage. Piezos were shielded against electromagnetic waves and physical vibrations. Years of diode testing includes a wide range of tests from oil bath tests to testing the diodes inside a cave in rural area.

The electrometer I've used is capable of detecting down to a few femto amps. One femto amp is 1E-15 amps. The highly shielded diodes have produce tens of thousands times more DC current than that, and the highly shielded piezo's have produced ~ a billion times as much current as that.

So there is no doubt that the DC current & voltage is indeed coming from the piezos and diodes. The question is, how do diodes and piezos doing it, and where is this source of energy coming from.

The best theory I have so far is that there seems to be an unknown flow of energy that *builds up* in an electric field. Within the diode there is an electric field at the junction. In the piezo there is an electric field throughout the entire material caused by electric dipoles due to a remanent polarization from the ferroelectric material, as seen in ferroelectric hysteresis curves.

Paul

[spoondini]

Paul - Your work is fascinating.  Can you take out a seperate thread apart from Dr. Jong to have focused discussion.

I'm not an EE or that technically savvy, but on the surface it sounds like you're really on to something here.

Great work!  It actually looks like work of historic significance.

[PaulLowrance]

Paul - Your work is fascinating.  Can you take out a seperate thread apart from Dr. Jong to have focused discussion.

I'm not an EE or that technically savvy, but on the surface it sounds like you're really on to something here.

Great work!  It actually looks like work of historic significance.

Thanks. I didn't mean to discuss diodes & piezos alone, but only their relation to Eugene Jeong's research. His theory is interesting, but IMO it's not what we're seeing. I do not believe it's due to neutrinos.

Here's the new thread
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8115
 
Regards,
Paul

[mscoffman]

@Paul

Ok...I was not questioning whether this is possible, only whether
your setup, which is very simple, and quite accessible, is showing
it...So I might build one and not be made a fool.  Thank you for
your answer "yes".

I will detail some rational which we already know after this.

Now description of an experiment...I suspect your box will know
which way is UP!

a) I pretty much guarantee that this effect is due to subatomic particles as
described earlier, the piezo quartz crystal is not a rectifier, so thermal
agitation would occur as AC to the piezo which it would have no way to
store much charge even if it could rectify it. Subatomic particles however
would cause Wigner lattice displacement energy of atoms. So the DC pulse
is most likely due to a Wigner restoration “chain reaction”. But mesons will
have a direction vector that happens because they come from the direction
of the sky and not from the direction of the earth. So if you take two back-
to-back opto isolators and if they can detect the DC pulse and if the
orientation of the piezo is fixed relative to the box, you will probably find
that the polarity of the pulse depends to an extent on which side of the box
is UP facing the sky.

I already believe you, that this pulse is unique kind of thing. So we already
know from standard electronic design that nothing that the low power relay
will do can easily be made to affect the piezo. This is not the proof we are
looking for.

b) The other thing one can do is put the box in a freezer and see if the
lower temperature, in absolute terms, affects the average power of the DC
pulse, it should, but only if this is a thermal effect.

So I will predict a) will happen and not b).

---

Here are the things which we already know;

There are two local radioactive effects: a) the altitude and b) the presents
of radioactive radon gas. Except for the mu mesons, the effects of cosmic
rays do not generally reach sea level. Tesla discovered cosmic rays (not
officially because he was not considered a official scientist). Tesla wanted
to know what caused the ignition of fluorescent tubes, neon tubes when
excited by relatively low voltages. So by definition there has got to be some
energy associated with mu meason flux.

According to the book “The Cooling Stars”: cosmic rays do not image their
sources, that  is; they come in from all different angles, their motion gets
twisted around by the magnetic fields in the solar system despite their high
energies, because they are charged particles, ie stripped helium nuecli. So
they don’t all come in perpendicularto the atmosphere…So they represent
sort of a signal. Finally we know that neutrino detectors are buried. In
tunnels, in mines, in arctic ice, and underwater. This is precisely so that
their small cross sectional coupling of neutrino signals can be separated
from those of muons. Which still have to be filtered out of their signal. So
what is being seen most likely is not neutrinos.


:S:MarkSCoffman