Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Thoughts on Earth Lines

Started by jadaro2600, September 26, 2009, 09:00:53 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

the_big_m_in_ok

MileHigh said:
Quote
You have probably seen clips on YouTube where people use antennas, diodes and capacitors go get power from the air.
I have indeed.  One guy got 120V max @ .03 A max(he claimed).  The video is on one of the Tesla forums, I think.
Quote
  They are lucky if they can charge a 10 uF cap to 5 volts in 24 hours.  That's something like nanowatts of power.
That would be 3.6 watts on a good day, and maybe .5-.75 watt on a typical day.  But not *nanowatts.*
Quote
With some sort of large antenna array, the amount of power you could extract from the air would probably be something between mircowatts or nanowatts of power per square meter.
There are several patents that were suspended as tethers from balloons.  High altitude is also high voltage.  Now suppose the balloons were attached to a circular pole system as well as being high altitude balloons?  Their accumulation effects may add to each other?
I realize one needs a lot more wire to get the same amount of power away from municipal power lines.  I said as much on another post.
But, copper wire isn't really expensive unless it needs replacing.  Chemically treated poles are more expensive, but they should last, especially if they're made of something like a South Amercan wood used to build piers.  Galvanized steel as high as a radio transmission tower?
Quote
A 100 square mile antenna array would be the world's largest megaproject.  The amount of energy expended and the cost to build it would be astronomical.
A square, interconnecting grid may not be necessary.  Radiating wires coming to a central point should be enough, for a simpler alternative.  They do have to be long, though.
Quote
The number crunching on the return on investment doesn't look very good.   :)
There's a rumor it was done, either in Alaska or Canada.  National defense was the motivation.  For that reason, it didn't matter what it cost.  A way can be found for enough of a reason.

--Lee   
"Truth comes from wisdom and wisdom comes from experience."
--Valdemar Valerian from the Matrix book series

I'm merely a theoretical electronics engineer/technician for now, since I have no extra money for experimentation, but I was a professional electronics/computer technician in the past.
As a result, I have a lot of ideas, but no hard test results to back them up---for now.  That could change if I get a job locally in the Bay Area of California.

MileHigh

The Big:

QuoteThat would be 3.6 watts on a good day, and maybe .5-.75 watt on a typical day.  But not *nanowatts.*

It's imperative that you understand the difference between power and energy.  I suggest that you research it.  Just for fun, I will pose a question:  If your antenna can charge a 10 uF cap to 5 volts in 24 hours, what is the average power level?  You don't have to answer, but the real question is are you capable of answering it.

Your treatise is interesting, but not practical.  I am not going to get into a big debate with you but the bottom line is that you simply can't get useful and reliable amounts of power from some sort of an antenna arrangement.  The EM energy density is simply too small to make anything at all practical.  You can generate millions and millions times more power per square meter using solar cells.

MileHigh

jadaro2600

I think I misunderstood my own thoughts, the parallel bars will conduct, however, the brush would be stationary, and the wire is not.

I'll have to look around some more for the book I read this in, but for now, the idea seems dead.

the_big_m_in_ok

MileHigh
said:
Quote
... I suggest that you research it.  Just for fun, I will pose a question:  If your antenna can charge a 10 uF cap to 5 volts in 24 hours, what is the average power level?  You don't have to answer, but the real question is are you capable of answering it. ...
http://www.mpoweruk.com/alternatives.htm

http://www.sengpielaudio.com/calculator-ohm.htm

Well, okay, the way you ask the question, "No."  I'll have to try and remember that power is energy over time.  A watt is 3,600 joules/hr.  A joule is 1 amp acting on 1 ohm in one second.
Capacitors don't necessarily exhibit resistance like a resistor, though.  Correct me if I'm wrong.  And a farad is merely a voltage potential.

The capacitor you illustrate would have an energy level of =  .000001 X 5 X 5  X .5 = .0000125 joule

...assuming the capacitor was fully charged?

--Lee
"Truth comes from wisdom and wisdom comes from experience."
--Valdemar Valerian from the Matrix book series

I'm merely a theoretical electronics engineer/technician for now, since I have no extra money for experimentation, but I was a professional electronics/computer technician in the past.
As a result, I have a lot of ideas, but no hard test results to back them up---for now.  That could change if I get a job locally in the Bay Area of California.

triffid

I have to agree with mile high,Until those who have claimed 50 kilowatts from the sky with only a small box of contents and 200 feet of antenna wire tell the rest of us how they did it.I have to agree that the antenna systems I've seen on u-tube or here at overunity.com don't produce much power at all.22 joules is not much power at all.Which is what Tommey Reed said he got on his video clip.Still its wonderful that its there at all.Triffid