Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Capillary Energy Source

Started by Azorus, November 09, 2009, 03:31:29 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Azorus

Can someone else help Creativity better understand how it works, my attempts are failing.

Would a proof of concept drawing help Creativity?

Creativity

Quote from: Azorus on November 09, 2009, 02:46:03 PM
@Creativity

I'm sorry your idea does not work the way you want it to..

Capillary energy source uses the capillary effect to raise the surface of the water in the capillary pipe.  When you increase the air pressure in the lower water tank it displaces water out of the top of the capillary tube because of the raised surface, and the fact that higher pressures move towards lower air pressure.  I am sorry that you don't understand what has been written and you keep referring back to your failed experiment.

Those that understand that the upper trough is not sealed, thus creating a lower air pressure, can understand that water should flow out and down the open pipe. 

You see unlike your failed wicking experiment where you had a sealed system, this one is only sealed on the lower water tank allowing a diferencial of air pressure.  But thanks for your coments they keep the thread going.

I do understand what u try to achieve and i do speak about the isomorf situation. let me draw it for u so u will see it too. The only difference is that u use positive pressure in the sealed tank below. By my experiment i proved that it takes the same amount of work (the same pressure gradient) to rise a water to a given level, whether it is a capillary pipe or not. Capillary do rises the water level to its top, but to get even the tiniest water drop off the top u will need to rise the equivalent of the water column hydrostatic pressure in a normal pipe. Doesn't matter if i rise pressure from under or reduce from above, that's just technical difference. By my experiment i have not tried to get water from one pipe to the other one, i tried to test if the pressure required to get the water off the capillary top is lower than the pressure to rise the water in the normal pipe to the given level .

If u r still not convinced then do a simple experiment, u just need a glass of water and two pipes. Place a wick in one of them. Connect both pipes on the top so u will have equal pressure in both of them, then suck some of the air from the pipes. U will see that wick will not start to have water above its end untill he water level in normal pipe wont rise higher than the wick top. Here u have a proof. 10 min test max.
Blues it through your outstanding life,leaving more than just footsteps behind (1999 B-stok by me).

By being intensively responsive to what others say,i do run a risk: I open myself up to the opinions of others.i will,at times, have a great understanding for their opinion.Sometimes,i will even change my own opinion because i realize that the other person is right.This "risk" i do not run if i am unresponsive to what others say.

Azorus

Once again I'm sorry your drawing is inaccurate.  You neglect the capillary effect in your drawing.

Azorus

I have created a more accurate drawing in paint, so forgive the terrible graphic.

While Creativity is correct that water will rise in both pipes, he once refuses to apply the cappillary effect.


Azorus

One last thing for you Creativity, how can you have lower air preassure in your tube if it is one system?  I draw this question form your illistration of your experiment.