Hilden-Brand Magnet Motor

[jake]

I have offered on another thread in this forum to help test Jack's motors.  Once I have seen and verified what he is doing, I'm sure he'll give me permission to report here.

I am contacting him via e-mail to set up an appointment to meet with him to validate his test methods, or to have him bring his motors to my shop where we will independently test.

I am an electrical engineer that operates an industrial automation business, specializing in motion control.  I have a certified Professional Engineer on staff who can validate everything we do if we test at my facility.

I will go on the record as being skeptical of Jack's claims, but at the same time open minded.  The numbers will tell the story.  If, for example his motor really runs at .021 hp at 2.2w input, we will be able to connect a generator and construct an appropriate circuit to supply power back to the motor to get it to self sustain.  .021h out at 2.2w in is producing about 7 times the input power.  Even with a bad generator we will have enough excess power to self sustain.  At 120% efficiency I would be concerned about losses downstream eating up the 20%.  At 500 to 700% the downstream losses won't matter.  There should be plenty of excess power to have 2.2w left to self power the motor.

I have adequate resources and technical expertise to help Jack validate what he is doing.  I don't need a 1/2 hp motor to prove or disprove this.  If his motor is producing .021hp (15+ watts) at 2.2w input it is more than significant enough to prove overunity if everything checks out.  After that it's just a matter of upscaling.

From what I'm reading here, Jack seems to have a good understanding of how to test things, so I hope to validate it and be blown away by the results.

P.S. Jacks motors are works of art while they are standing still as far as I'm concerned.  Beautiful machining work and craftsmanship.

[Liberty]

Wow, what happened to all of Jack's posts?  Most of his posts are nowhere to be found...

Anyone know what is going on?

[Light]

Do not give-up, Jack. All forums have sceptics and un-believers. In yours case there is no necessity to believe - it's a fact.
Just let us a chance to understand the concept closer, pls. Some of us have a not bad ideas, but yours's realy good...
Of course set-up first all your patent business.
Thks, again.

[hartiberlin]

Hi Jack, please keep us updated about your progress and new measurements. Your motors look great and I would like to see them running a DC generator, so you could close the loop. Many thanks, regards,Stefan.

[FredWalter]

I kinda figured out that this message board is full of skeptics and non-beleivers.

You didn't come here to share info on how to duplicate your invention - even your patent appliation is 'secret'. All you came here for was to ask for money, to help you continue working on your invention.

Can you blame people for being skeptical?

At the begining I figured that this message board(overunity.com) would reflect it's name and maybe have a lot of positive input.

Given your unwillingness to share details on your invention, the only positive input anyone could have given you was cash. And without any details, or proof that you have something that is real, no one is going to give you a pile of cash. If you look around, you'll notice that where the plans for a device aren't kept a secret, there are a number of people trying to reproduce those devices, with a lot of positive input from the non-reproducers. The magnet motor from Argentina is an example where there is lots of positive input.

That other fellow's idea, of using a small generator, that is scaled to work with your 500% efficient prototype, makes sense. If you could do that, or allowed that fellow to do that, and you ended up with more electrical power out, than in, now *that* would convince some of the skeptics. And make it easier to get investors to beat a path to your door.