Joule Thief 101

[tinman]

 author=MileHigh link=topic=8341.msg476866#msg476866 date=1457558131]



MileHigh

Brad's definition of resonance in a wine glass is "you hit it at the resonant frequency and it starts to resonate."  You might not have a problem with that in your bound condition but the real world and for any sane person with a reasonable technical background it's completely ridiculous.  They would find that "definition" laughable and better for Romper Room than a forum where people are supposed to be researching energy with oscilloscopes and mutimeters.

Your full of shit MH. That is not my definition of resonance in a wine glass at all.
Go and find the post where i defined resonance in a wine glass the way you said i have.

In all likelihood Brad will not lift a finger to try to educate himself.  Smoky2 also gave a jaw-dropping "explanation" for a resonating wine glass and if you are astute you saw how Brad has flat-out disagreed with him.  Magluvin is a mystery.

More BS from you MH.
Please also show where i disagreed with smoky's definition of a resonating wine glass--and dont get it mixed up with the !sound waves! traveling through a vacuum conversation<-- as you do your mix and match thing all the time,to suit your need's.

My advice to anyone that is curious about answering the two questions about the wine glass is to do some research and take a crack at answering them.  If nobody gets it the answers will be revealed later.  It's supposed to be a pop quiz and not an insane asylum.

!How is the resonant frequency of a wine glass determined!
This is your anal question MH,and it has been answered--many times.

I cant wait to see your answer,and i am going to refrain from blocking you for just this reason.
Im waiting for something wonderful--Like maybe-->
The resonant frequency of a wine glass is determined by the frictional quantity of the system as a whole

What determines the resonant frequency of a wine glass?
The resonant frequency of a wine glass is determined by the frictional quantity of the system as a whole

MHs theory of everything?--i really hope not
Not only has this been covered (which YOU probably missed,due to your skip post reading flaw-as the case with the ICE),but like your top speed of a car analogy,you once again missed something very important

But anyway,we shall see how you stack up with your answers to come.

Do you see Chet - this is a fun pop quiz that has people stymied.  Now people can take it at face value as a pop quiz and wait patiently for the answers if they don't get them, or they can stomp around like a bunch of near-crazy people pulling out their hair and spewing out tons of negativity.  All over two measly questions about a resonating wine glass?

Your own questions,that have yet no answers-apparently.
There is crazy here for sure MH,but it is dose not dwell in those you specify.
Take a closer look in the mirror.


Brad

[MileHigh]

shoulda said something about forty pages ago but OKEE DOEKEY

Seriously challenged communication skills is the cause.  Why don't you work on fixin dat ting?

[Magluvin]

I had thought about it and looked up science of bells. The first on the list was this on Yahoo search

http://www.thebelltower.com.au/downloads/Science_of_Bells.pdf

Cleanin up shop. Was a wreck. Cleaned of bench. Ready to go.

Mags

[MileHigh]

Brad:

Here is the first reference I could find that you made to an ICE.

I dont think you grasp the reasoning behind resonance. The reasoning being much the same to that of having the timing correct in an ICE engine-done for best performance.

Webby linked to a short article about using a air resonator to improve the air intake cycle.  The article had a diagram and a description and made sense.  What you say above is meaningless because you offer no details whatsoever.  Without details I took "timing" to mean the most common reference for timing, the spark plug timing, and there is resonance in that.

So with your absolutely abysmal communication skills of course you are going to get into trouble all the time because you can't convey information properly and consequently people can't understand you properly.  It's a serious serious problem that you have and you should do something about it.

Going back to the resonators for improving the air intake cycle, they aren't making use of resonance in a continuous cycle, they are more one-shot devices that are slaved to the timing of the pistons.

You dont even know what the correct scientific determination of resonance is,and then you have the audacity to say that !we! all need to demonstrate competence with respect to resonance.

That is just a bunch of useless trash talk and everybody knows it's useless trash talk.  All that you do is hurt yourself when you carry on like that.

So why don't you just link to your preferred answers to the two questions or just answer them here in your own words and I will consider that your "final answer."  You have tried to answer three or four times so I don't know which is the one you want to stand by.  But if you are going to link then don't link to something with a bunch of Google copy/pastes, that is not a valid answer.

MileHigh

[Magluvin]

Weird. so far I havent found anything on a deep science of bells. Still looking. Is it a secret science? Silence the science?  lol

Mags