Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Joule Thief 101

Started by resonanceman, November 22, 2009, 10:18:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 68 Guests are viewing this topic.

MileHigh

Brad:

Some advice:  If you are going to post a diagram, and least try to have what you see in the diagram make sense.  In your diagram the output waveform shown does not match the physical setup shown, it's a mistake.

Indeed I am being somewhat picky here, because most people will understand what is going on.  The problem is that often enough you are dealing with people that don't understand what is going on and therefore they can easily be misled and confused by confusing graphic images that have errors in them.

MileHigh

Grumage

Twas spelt like this when I went to school !!  ;)

"Coulomb's law, or Coulomb's inverse-square law"

Typo?

Cheers Grum.

MileHigh

Quote from: Erfinder on April 10, 2016, 04:34:13 AM

I have found that there are two very specific geometries that one should look for, specifically:

            *  (a) where the point of maximum flux change is not coincident with the point of maximum flux density, peak voltage is just before and just after TDC.  (Two voltage nodes centered by a current node)
            *  (b) where the point of maximum flux change is coincident with the point of maximum flux density, peak induced voltage will be at TDC.  (Two current nodes centered by a voltage node)

Regards

Erfinder:

If you are going to talk about geometries and the outputs you can get from those geometries, then please go ahead and put up some physical and electrical diagrams of the setups that you are discussing along with voltage and current timing diagrams that illustrate exactly what you are saying.

What you are saying is cryptic, and I am not convinced of what you are saying at all.  However, you seem to be stating things in relatively simple terms.  Hence the request to explain precisely what you mean with the aid of associated mechanical/electrical diagrams and their voltage and current timing diagrams.

Thanks,

MileHigh

minnie




   I can see this as becoming known as the "Junkie-Tinman Law"

MileHigh

Quote from: minnie on April 10, 2016, 10:53:06 AM

   I can see this as becoming known as the "Junkie-Tinman Law"

LOL

And here is the "Postulate of Blank Stares:"

What if ϕB is 4?

What if ϕB is 17*(sqrt(t))?

What if ϕB is A*cos(omega*t)?

What if ϕB is K(t^3.67)?

What if ϕB is B*sin(omega*7t)?