Joule Thief 101

[picowatt]

One last example of PW Science...

So, do you not agree that Faraday's law states that the induced voltage is proportional to the rate of change of the magnetic field?

Doesn't Faraday's law therefore "predict" that the induced voltage will be at a minimum when the magnetic field's rate of change is also at a minimum?

[MileHigh]

Brad:

Read what I said again:  In your diagram the output waveform shown does not match the physical setup shown.

You are not going to invent your own reality here.  You made a mistake so suck it up like a man.

MileHigh

[EMJunkie]

No, we did look at a simple example.  It was the one Tinman presented.

Yes it was a simple example, you and TK got the description of Faraday's Law wrong on that one too!!!

How is that? Is it because you feel like ramdomply predicting predictions?

Tommorrow Faradays Law will be predicting Egg for Breakfast I think!!!

Hope I have eggs, if not I might magically change the prediction of eggs to Beetroot Salad.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

So, do you not agree that Faraday's law states that the induced voltage is proportional to the rate of change of the magnetic field?

Doesn't Faraday's law therefore "predict" that the induced voltage will be at a minimum when the magnetic field's rate of change is also at a minimum?

Youre flat out making all the random predictions PW, how about you choose - youre good at randomly randomising Scientific Principles.

No matter what the evidence, its ok though, because you cant read, they have no baring on your existance do they?

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org

[EMJunkie]

Brad, your scope shot shows the expected 90 degree phase difference as predicted by Faraday's Law:

You see, Faradays Law is entirely dependant on the very values that TK says that Faradays Law Predicts.

See, math shows you and TK to be wrong:

E.M.F = -N dϕ_B/dt

Where:

ϕ = BA Cos(θ)

is a change in ϕ in respect to time. So this quantity is a necessity, to accurately know, well before we can even calculate Faradays law.

This quantity (ϕ) is Design/System dependant, in other words, different Geometrys and Magnetic Fields will show a completely different result for ϕ!!!

This is completely independant of Faraday's law!!! Nothing to do, at all with Faraday's Law!!! Infact Faraday's Law is Governed by these factors!!!



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


The Only things that Faradays Law Predicts:

   1: The E.M.F
   2: The Sign of the E.M.F

As stated many hundreds of times now, the Sign is Anti Phase. 180 Degrees out of phase from the Source.

Specifically!

So my Flowery Science fiend, you are wrong, dead wrong, and to stubborn to admit!

Brads Circuit is completely outside of these facts and not the topic of this debate. It is entirely related to the description TK presented of how the Circuit was working as referenced above.

   Chris Sykes
       hyiq.org