Global Warming

[Azorus]

Holy shit!  has anyone else read that treaty?  It is scary as shit.  talk about taxation without repersentation.

http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/un-fccc-copenhagen-2009.pdf

That was the latest i could find.

[PhiScience]

  Ok lets take a wider look at climate change.

Here’s a graph of estimated global temperature for the past 425,000 years. This temperature record was computed from analysis of ice cores taken at Vostok, a Russian research base in Antarctica, starting in 1970. The deepest core reached 3,623 m (11,886 ft) into the ice sheet. The ice at the bottom has been undisturbed for about half a million years. During this time there have been four ice ages.

Image based on data from the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/icecore/antarctica/vostok/vostok_data.html

Global temperature variation for the past 425,000 years - The present is at the right. The horizontal 0 line represents the 1961â€"1990 average global temperature. The numbers on the left show the variation from that baseline in °C.

I will have another chart with co2 overlay soon for the same period of time and you may be surprised with what you see. 

[Pirate88179]

Holy shit!  has anyone else read that treaty?  It is scary as shit.  talk about taxation without repersentation.

http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2009/10/un-fccc-copenhagen-2009.pdf

That was the latest i could find.

Exactly!  Obama will toss out our Constitution by signing that treaty and this new "entity" the treaty creates (Great post Silverfish) will then have sovereignty over the USA as well as every other signatory country.  It is madness, pure madness.
It is a an overthrow of our form of government.

I say, by signing that treaty, Obama is committing treason.

Bill

[Cap-Z-ro]

I believe I posted the "resume" of John P. Holdren, 'Science Czar', silverfish, but not in the same depth...thanks, that provides the reader with a more complete picture.

Worth repeating nonetheless, for those who may have overlooked it the first time out.


" Silliness. Anyone who's looked into the matter and cares to be objective knows how silly that statement is.  Numerous times I've quoted NASA "

I wood argue the silliness lies in continually quoting NASA as a reputable source.

I've lost track of how many times they have been exposed for covering things up and airbrushing photos...and are widely known derisively as N.ever A. S.traight A.nswer.

" Instead, why don't you post facts instead of this campaign of lies."

This is the 2nd caution for accusing people of being dishonest...deletions will begin at 3.

At that point remove post button will be clicked.

Here we can post whatever opinions we wish, all that is asked is that others are allowed the to do the same without being attacked personally.


" OH MY WORD!!! Not another Conspiracy NUT!!!!!! "

Over the last little while I haven't been keeping up with the latest trends...apparently during that time, the meaning of the term Conspiracy NUT somehow been changed to 'guy with his head on straight'...who gnu ?

Regards...

[Cap-Z-ro]

Great posts folks...no wonder they didn't want Monckton to have that information.

Thats explosive stuff if it becomes widely known to the average taxpayer.

You can bet it will be suppressed or spun by the shmedia...you may even see it spun here...and that may be in progress as I type.

Regards...