Global Warming

[PaulLowrance]

1)  IF global temps are dropping, on average, then Global warming is NOT part of the discussion.  If global temps are rising, then the REASON MUST be determined BEFORE any attempt is made to correct it.  (Anyone read the data about general other causes?  Just a thought...)

Global temperature is increasing. You can't take an average spanning only a few years because of fluctuations.

2)  If Temp Dropping, the idea of trying to lower the CO2 in the atmosphere will automatically MAKE THE PROBLEM WORSE.  Unless absolute proof can be put forward, acceptable to ALL involved, the idea of limiting CO2 can only be for other reasons.  What those are, are not my place to say.

Green move movement is about reducing ones carbon footprint and helping the natural environment.

4)  The ultimate, obvious scam part, even if CO2 were totally responsible.  The EPA, in the US, has declared CO2 to be a poisonous gas.  This is for both the "Cap and Trade" and internal Tax reasons.  (That's on record, and may be looked up...  Several years old, too...)   Doesn't anyone read anymore?  All US businesses will have to pay a tax for the number of employees they have, as well as all persons in the US having to also pay.  Remember, CO2 is exhaled by the average human, and THIS IS in the process of being setup as a TAX on all people.  Sounds like a "Control" to me, but that is my opinion, and not worth anything.  Please ignore that.

You didn't provide a reference. Also, too much of any gas is deadly.

Using the above 3 as a basis for examining the "Motive" behind the CO2 situation, if seems to be too obvious for anyone to accept the BS that has been put forth, unless they have other agenda's.

The only valid motive so far is for Big Oil to kill the green movement.

Can ANYONE say that CO2 is the WORST pollution humans are putting out?

CO2, methane, CO, and many other pollutants.



Paul

[Azorus]

Paul you didn't provide a reference to your material so it is invalid, sorry.

P.S.  where is the address to send you the legal documentation.

[PaulLowrance]

Of course, we know that NASA would never lie to us - about anything.

Competitive Enterprise Institute (CEI) had their attorneys file three Notices of Intent to File Suit against NASA. Chris Horner, representing CEI, said the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies failed to comply with the Freedom of Information Act for the past three years.

First of all you provided no references, so I can't take your word for it. And they must be valid references. Also, isn't it a stretch to insinuate that a failure to comply with the Freedom of Information Act means NASA must be a liar? Maybe NASA discovered something they're afraid to reveal. 

Paul

[PaulLowrance]

Paul you didn't provide a reference to your material so it is invalid, sorry.

I have in previous posts. 

P.S.  where is the address to send you the legal documentation.

I don't trust you. You people will have to dig hard to find me. I'll be ready. 


Paul

[Azorus]

Paul,

Just pointing out to other people that may not have followed all of the thread that you generally follow the same pattern of saying to people that do not follow your point of view, you didn't post a link to support your facts so your thread is invalid.

Which for those of you whom have not been following the entire thread Paul will not read it, even if you post a link.