Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

Started by PaulLowrance, December 04, 2009, 09:13:07 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 90 Guests are viewing this topic.

gravityblock

Quote from: lumen on January 11, 2010, 11:10:19 PM
You could be right, but it just don't make sense. Why use a pair of magnets and place the same polarity out when it would be much easier to simply use one magnet, or a long skinny magnet, or whatever would work best since you only need the same polarity facing out?
It takes more power to change domain direction than any energy gained by the change. So unless the rotor magnets can provide near saturation in the core and provide it along the same direction as the coil, it could never be OU.
I suppose we don't have long to wait. Although I doubt these tiny details that make all the difference are going to be revealed any time soon.

It makes total sense to me and I've already explained it many times.  With like poles the core does not increase towards saturation as the magnets approach the core.  This means it doesn't lose being attractive the closer the magnets get to the core.  This means a greater potential in speed during it's approach.  It also don't lose some of the speed it gained while the core is increasing towards saturation from the pulse.  This eliminates the CEMF on both the approach and departure with the core.  It is using Newton's Third law to defeat Lenz.  This is exploiting the most mechanical gain possible without losing it.  The fast rise time in current and a core that is saturated extremely fast is lowering the energy input requirements for the pulse.  The mechanical gain will be more than the electrical losses.  If you can re-capture the current from the pulse, then that is an additional bonus and you will have a huge mechanical gain with very little electrical losses.

Do you have a replication?  If you don't, then I suggest you attempt to build one so it begins to make sense to you.  You have a very good bench with all of the tools and equipment needed for the replication.  Maybe you don't have time to replicate and that is understandable.  I don't have a bench or money to replicate, but I am making every effort to do experiments and to share my results so we can progress quicker.

There is always a chance I may be wrong, but my experiments at this time suggests the dual magnets are like poles.  Another replicator here already said like poles increases the speed which means a shorter pulse width and less energy input required.  I think when I lower my input energy for the pulse to allow the magnets to pass by instead of being repelled then It will rotate in the same direction regardless of polarity input.


GB
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

happyfunball

COP>1 talk starts in less than an hour (17:00 GMT)

onthecuttingedge2005

it is called overly efficient, if you could store that energy inside a superconductor only then would you approach 99.999 percent efficient return. all else are hopeless lies. that really depends upon your gullibility gauge.

gravityblock

I decreased the power input by 75% and it still runs around the same RPM.  It does take it much longer to reach top speed and has a very slow spin up, but this was expected.  I no longer have the anomalies after reducing the input energy with my webcam or TV.  Everything is fine now.  :)


GB
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.

gravityblock

Quote from: onthecuttingedge2005 on January 12, 2010, 01:50:32 AM
it is called overly efficient, if you could store that energy inside a superconductor only then would you approach 99.999 percent efficient return. all else are hopeless lies. that really depends upon your gullibility gauge.

There is an infinite amount of energy in the universe.  Since energy can't be created nor destroyed and we know it exists, then it must be infinite.  It has no beginning and no end (infinite), but yet it exists.  All we need to do is tap into it just like a solar panel taps into the energy from the sun.  We didn't put any energy into a solar panel, but yet we get energy out of it.

With the Orbo, we put a little energy into it and get much more out.  This is not breaking any laws of physics.  We already have an abundance of infinite energy available to us in the universe.  Have a little faith and reach out to this infinite source.  I know, this is against your belief.  That is OK, we will all be believers in due time.


GB
Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again, and expecting a different result.

God will confuse the wise with the simplest things of this world.  He will catch the wise in their own craftiness.