STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

[callanan]

Egostorm??

I have made my motor using high impedance toroid taken from a differential protection sensor, a fan and reed .
With the high resistance I had a supply voltage above 100 V.
No success, the only effect was to squeak the toroid, the resonance remanis also reducing the voltage.
I suggest to don't use the reed it interferes with the magnet for a wide area of rotation, and also generates interaction torque.
the toroid was positioned tangential.
Nex step hall sensor circuit and toroid face to face the magnet.

Hi Wings,

I have found that increasing the input voltage in an effort to get the rotor to turn only resulted in more wasted energy being dissipated as heat in the coil. I actually have had far more success by reducing the input voltage as much as possible whilst changing my rotor/coil arrangement to result in far more torque. But the most important thing I found was that by using a piece of iron or ferrite next to the torroidal drive coils, the torque was significantly increased for very low input voltage and power.

Please see the following pictures. I am able to run this motor on as little as 0.25 watts at low RPM from 50-100rpm. Thats an input of 250ma at 1V. Without those washers you see next to the coils, there is no way this motor will run on such little power. I am using a reed switch for the switching which works fine for low voltages.

Regards,

Ossie

[k4zep]

Hi Wings,

I have found that increasing the input voltage in an effort to get the rotor to turn only resulted in more wasted energy being dissipated as heat in the coil. I actually have had far more success by reducing the input voltage as much as possible whilst changing my rotor/coil arrangement to result in far more torque. But the most important thing I found was that by using a piece of iron or ferrite next to the torroidal drive coils, the torque was significantly increased for very low input voltage and power.

Please see the following pictures. I am able to run this motor on as little as 0.25 watts at low RPM from 50-100rpm. Thats an input of 250ma at 1V. Without those washers you see next to the coils, there is no way this motor will run on such little power. I am using a reed switch for the switching which works fine for low voltages.

Regards,

Ossie

Ossie,

EXCELLENT MY OL FRIEND!!!!!

You have an excellent contribution to the art on several points, maybe what you have discovered is how the steorm unit works on 1.25 VDC by using the back up washers!!!!!.  I noticed that JLN had a large mass behind his coils that looked like ferrite too.  MOST EXCELLENT....Good to see you are in the game!!!!!  I am at my computer now.  Email as usual.

Ben K4ZEP

[hartiberlin]

MH maybe I should make a really big post quoting you on things you have been saying on a FREE ENERGY OPEN SOURCE RESEARCH FORUM which is called OVERUNITY.COM. I don't even have to look farther than your above post:

I swear to god if you keep these negative rants up which you have made in countless threads without any single figment of experimentation or open mindness I will make it my sole purpose on this forum to get you banned from it. Consider it a miracle Stefan hasn't made that choice yet. Either reconsider your unreasonable and complete disbelieve in the sole purpose and cause of this forum or you will be removed from it like garbage.

You have been forwarned.

I think Broli is right and MileHigh needs a rest from posting
twisting the facts over here, so I have set him on read only.

@Ossi,
well done !
Looking forward to see a few measurement numbers from you.
Nice enhancement with the iron washers !

Regards, Stefan.

[exnihiloest]

...
Steorn has’t yet shown proof for overunity. However, Steorn has shown practical elimination of back emf. How is that conventional?
...

Steorn do not eliminate back emf, they recover the energy of the back emf.
A simple circuit with a diode connecting the coil to a capacitor can recover the back emf energy when the current in the coil is switched off. For example, all switching power supplies recover back emf, it is conventional technics. Even beginners in electronics engineering know it. It is the same in motors, and it is the reason their efficency can go up to 95%.

[callanan]

Ossie,

EXCELLENT MY OL FRIEND!!!!!

You have an excellent contribution to the art on several points, maybe what you have discovered is how the steorm unit works on 1.25 VDC by using the back up washers!!!!!.  I noticed that JLN had a large mass behind his coils that looked like ferrite too.  MOST EXCELLENT....Good to see you are in the game!!!!!  I am at my computer now.  Email as usual.

Ben K4ZEP

Thanks Ben,

It is amazing how by just playing with a torroidal coil, magnets on a rotor and a battery, you can get far more insight into how this motor works and it starts becoming obvious as to how improvements maybe made. In fact, it now appears to me that what Steorn has presented publically is only the very basic embodiment of this motor which really produces the most minimal torque. As long as you use torroidal coils as your motor drive coils, which do not see the rotor magnet's field, then I am sure there are very many ways that the torque can be increased significantly.

Regards,

Ossie