STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

[Omnibus]

because "heat" can mean energy or power

Absolutely not. And, don't try to hide your incompetence by saying that what I write doesn't make any sense. It does.

[MileHigh]

Omnibus:

On the contrary. Rotational kinetic energy does count. If the energy balance shows that rotational kinetic energy plus the heat is greater than the electrical input energy that will be a genuine OU machine.

Can you elaborate on your statement above?  You say that it makes sense so please flesh out the details with three or four paragraphs so that we can have a much clearer understanding of what you mean.  Right now I don't understand it at all.

MileHigh

[Omnibus]

@MileHigh,

You don't make a distinction between energy and power. To you there is ambiguity regarding heat in terms of energy or power. You're incompetent and that's the elaboration you deserve. The best thing to do is to stop  wasting the bandwidth of this board because there are important things to discuss here and the least such discussion neads is an incompetent but very active participant to interefere.

[MileHigh]

Omnibus:

So you won't elaborate on your statement?  C'mon go for it, don't hide.  Please clarify what you really mean to say.

Yes, you have stated that I am incompetent several times now.  However, any person reading this thread would disagree with you, I have tried to make a valuable contribution and got the discussion going.  So you just end up making yourself look like a fool by calling me incompetent for one tiny mistake.  You are just playing the "bad guy."

Please elaborate on your statement, don't say "You're incompetent and that's the elaboration you deserve." because that is childish nonsense.

On the contrary. Rotational kinetic energy does count. If the energy balance shows that rotational kinetic energy plus the heat is greater than the electrical input energy that will be a genuine OU machine.

What does the above statement mean because I can't make any sense of it.  If you don't answer I won't ask again.  I will simply assume that you can't in fact back up your statement and you are chickening out.

MileHigh

[icanbeatbob]

Ok boys........step back.........ain't no sense in anyone else getting hurt.

Just what I have been waiting for. The big egos drop in a take over the thread so as to prove their empirical knowledge in a public forum.

Whatever your justification is to disrupt or manipulate this tread is rude, and/or immature, and/or disrespectful. I am sure you will reply with your justification of why it is so important to give us your wisdom, and the theory behind it.

Let this thread be. If not, kiss a fat hogs ass.

Respectfully, yet fully disappointed in you kids,

Brad