STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

[k4zep]

Hi All,

What an expensive work of art.  Nice machine work!  Looks to me like a Adams motor/generator with a torroidal twist. First remember that a 10Ah battery can power a low friction rotor for months if not years! Now to get to the "Guts" question.

Does it actually work as an excess energy producing device?

The most simple way to "prove" this technology is to GET RID OF THE BATTERY and run on a low impedance/low leakage Super Cap. At the COP claimed it would have no problem increasing the charge/voltage on the Cap. over time. If run away in unit is feared, use 1.5V zener of adequate wattage across Cap. to stabilize unit.  IF OU, voltage in Cap. will increase  from initial charge setting/rpm level  to zener limit along with an increase in RPM, then stabilization. 

Spin it up to speed with 1.25 V energy source and Cap. in parallel, let it stabilize (time?).  Monitor Cap. voltage with 20 Meg input, 4 1/2 digit  DVM. (if you are curious as I am, I assume it can power 20 meg load of meter and replace any leakage in the Cap.!) REMOVE energy SOURCE. Run on CAP only.  It either works or it doesn't!.....Until they remove ANY charge producing (Primary or secondary battery/device) except the motor/generator, I will be skeptical of this work of art.  I am a believer......just not in this technology as demonstrated. 

My gut feeling is you will never see a Cap. replace that battery.

My name is Ben, been there done that, happy holidays to all. 

[PaulLowrance]

I think all you need to do is just stop for a second and think really hard, what principal makes this device operate.
If you do this, you will see the exact reason this device is OU.
No other device uses this exact effect!
Think of the field going through the toroidal core by passing the two magnets along the upper and lower quadrants of the core.
AND when they reach the center point!

Hi,

If you are saying no other device design uses the effect found in the Steorn Orbo then IMO that's incorrect. Going back years ago, all on my own I came up with designs that use that effect. Along the way I've seen numerous other inventors that have also used that effect. On paper it works out great, so it's definitely worth trying.

Paul

[PaulLowrance]

http://www.freeenergytimes.com/?p=163

"Steorn have promised that in January there will be live validation and replication sessions which should provide help shed light on these issues."

Also supposedly Steorn said they're going to put all kinds of meters on the Orbo in January. Looks like January is going to be a great month! 

[ResinRat2]

"Steorn have promised that in January there will be live validation and replication sessions which should provide help shed light on these issues."

[exnihiloest]

exnihiloest,

There is nothing wrong with healthy skepticism, but condemnation before investigation is folly (that makes no sense).
...

I agree, gravityblock.
Nevertheless the burden of proof is not on the side of the investigation. If evidence is not provided by the claimant, the investigation need not even be made. An electric motor running with a battery is not a sign and even less an evidence of COP>1.