STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

[dradak1]

Hi CP,

The motor has been running all day but the battery has NOT dropped even one millivolt. But please see my latest post for some interesting developments with this motor.

Two reeds allow far greater pulse width and timing control but also MUST be used to take advantage of the proper back emf to battery recovery I am employing in this circuit.

The generator coils in series is important to get the right voltage for the right RPMs that the battery needs to see. In this motor, yes the generator coils are also diring the rotor. Please see me latest video and post for further details.

The pulse is small and at the top peak of the induced generator coil's voltage.

Regards,

Ossie

You ARE THE MAN - Ossie.

Since you didn't remove magnets that where used for orbo replication - can you make another coil (similar as you show on one of your previous video with drill - maybe just wider to match size of those magnets) and place all around as additional generator? 

Thanks,

Dragan

[gravityblock]

GB, I seriously doubt you're fooling any legit people her. It's just  that you give praise to posts that say they're machine has ran on a battery for X amount of time, while throwing stones at COP>1 or efficiency>100% measurements.

You're not fooling anyone here either.  You was wrong about the metglas being a nanocrystalline material.  You are wrong about the metglas square loop cores not needing a small reset current in order for them to become fully attractive again (this means we need circuitry to do this small reset current, but you don't tell anyone about this and you try to deny this even after it is stated on the page for the Metglas square loop cores). 

You are wrong about metglas being a softer magnetic material than finemet.  You are wrong about needing a material with the highest permeability (Steorn said a very soft magnetic material. He never mentioned anything about permeability).  You are wrong about saying finemet doesn't have a permeability that is comparable to metglas.  You are wrong about your COP measurements.

I said, "I hope he has a self-runner" (paraphrasing).  I also hope you have a self-runner soon.  I don't care about COP measurements.  Show me a self-runner and not COP measurements.  A self-runner with more out than in is the final and best test.  I'm sorry, my standards are a little higher and more reasonable than yours.

I am withdrawing from this thread so I don't lose my sanity.  I suggest you do the same PL for the benefit of progress.  You have twisted the facts in this thread more than MH and I'm really surprised you're not on read-only mode.  If I'm wrong about something, it's not intentional.  The things you are wrong about looks intentional to me in order to mislead this thread.

I am asking everyone in this thread, Please don't respond to this post or any of my previous posts so I can leave this thread with a little bit of sanity I have left.  Dradak1 is right, this stuff is childish and I don't want to be a part of it anymore.

Thanks

[dradak1]

"Tiny orbo replication" update
http://globalfreeenergy.info/2010/01/27/tiny-orbo-replication-update/

I might be scraping up some pennies today to buy an Enermax Marathon PC fan because they claim to have frictionless magnetic levitation bearings inside.

Congratulation Paul - that's the spirit.

Thanks,

Dragan

[PaulLowrance]

You are wrong about the metglas square loop cores not needing a small reset current in order for them to become fully attractive again (this means we need circuitry to do this small reset current, but you don't tell anyone about this).

You are wrong in theory and wrong in practice. The magnets have no problems being attracted to the toroids. Maybe you forget I have these Metglas MAGAMP toroids and magnets. And as far as the other guy who said the these toroids have less attraction than ferrite toroids, I seriously doubt there's much difference at all. These Metglas toroids are encased in a plastic casing that makes them appear larger than they are. I would love to see a comparison with a ferrite toroid of the same dimensions and same Bsat, and you'll see the magnetic attraction will be very similar. And the separation distance between the magnet & toroid (not the plastic) must be the same.

You are wrong about metglas being a softer magnetic material than finemet.

Prove it.

You are wrong about needing a material with the highest permeability (Steorn said a very soft magnetic material. He never mentioned anything about permeability).

I can't respond to your gibberish.

You are wrong about your COP measurements.

Ah, so now you're saying my COP measurements were wrong, LOL.

I said, "I hope he has a self-runner" (paraphrasing).  I also hope you have a self-runner soon.  I don't care about COP measurements.  Show me a self-runner and not COP measurements.  A self-runner with more out than in is the final and best test.  I'm sorry, my standards are a little higher and more reasonable than yours.

Your statements show you're not a true scientist. A true scientist would focus on the excess energy, which is seen in the COP - efficiency measurements.

[dradak1]

...
I am withdrawing from this thread so I don't lose my sanity.  I suggest you do the same PL for the benefit of progress. 
...

GB - your contribution is grate and very appreciated and if you withdraw you will just make step in opposite direction of progressing. 

Thanks,

Dragan