Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

Started by PaulLowrance, December 04, 2009, 09:13:07 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Jimboot

Hey Guys, Ossie's toroidless design reminded me of a doco I saw about 5 years ago. Specifically the work of Doug Konzen. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8585794339313791442# At about 19:31 into the vid you will see his reed switch electromag overunity motor. The doco is A machine to die for - the quest for free energy.

captainpecan

Quote from: woopy on January 27, 2010, 04:50:34 PM
Hi Captain
thanks for supporting this OSSbo idea

what i can not target  is why i don't get the same scope trace across the coils.  Ossies shows us a regular oscillating trace Plus on the top a little square spique. On my replication i get what is on the picture on my previous post  that is   a straight  up curve than going smoothly down than almost flat than back to zero than  ( i suppose must be the) kickback power     = a straight down  and up square trace  ??

I jusat try a new rotor with alternating polarities  NSNS etc   but the trace is always the same and the timing with the reed switch is much more difficult to tune and the rpm stay very low.

HEHE not so easy the quest to OU

but lets go on with courage and determination



Hello Ossie  some result or video  ?


good night


Laurent

Well, when you changed your magnets to alternating polarities, did you change your pulse to alternating polarities also?  Or at least pulse half the time on the approach instead of while it's leaving.  If not, that could explain why you are not getting the speed and results.  You may be putting on the brakes half the time when you pulse it.

As far as your scope trace, I'm not for sure but it should be at least similar to Ossies any time you just pass a magnet by an air core coil.  All I can figure is that maybe your coils are not as perfectly in line as you thought.  Since they are hooked in series, you should be careful to make sure each magnet is passing over each core at the same time and in the same trajectory to get a nice AC wave.  Maybe you are simply canceling each of them out against each other a bit so they are not working together as nicely as what Ossie's is.  When I look at the photo's you posted, it does seem like the coils are not exactly lined up correctly, but of course I can't tell for sure in a photo it could just be the angle it was shot.  Just a thought.  As far as that little square spike at the top of Ossie's trace, that's simply the on time for his power pulse.  You can see how is turning on the pulse just before the peak of the generator pulse, and turning it off as close to the exact peak as he can.  The rest of his trace is just a normal AC wave that you should be shooting for in yours I believe.  Get that same generating wave, even just hand turning it, then you can start trying to tune your pulse like Ossie did.

PaulLowrance

Quote from: captainpecan on January 27, 2010, 12:58:17 PM
Damn, I logged on and saw a bunch of posts, and was excited to see how much everyone has learned and moved forward.  Instead I got to just see a butt load of bickering.  Paul, you have got to chill the hell out.  This is just getting really STUPID!!!!  Ossie simply posted some interesting results that everyone in this thread thought were fantastic and show promise, but you have laughed at him because he did not measure COP yet.  Here's your qoute...WE DON'T CARE!!!!  WE ARE TRYING TO WORK HERE!  Although I agree just like pretty much everyone in here, that COP measurements are scientific proof and very much needed if one is to get scientist backing.  But I'll be honest, I want a self runner, and do not give a crap if scientists back it, and I'm pretty sure Ossie feels the same way although I will not speak for him.  A self runner cannot be disputed. One that the battery dies on, causes tons of arguments over how the COP was measured and pissing matches, that ultimately still lead to a device that runs until it stops.

Please get back on track Paul.  I mean no disrespect, but please stop getting irritated if someone gets results that do not fit your bill exactly.  I'm just curious though, why is it that you do not want a self runner also?  I thought we were all after the same thing here.

What a sad attack. I offer help and you attack me, lol. Very interesting. And don't tell me to get on track when it's people like you that are attacking and I'm the one talking about science. Yet one more time, the reason for the COP - efficiency measurements is so you people will know when there's an increase in excess energy. Geez, unbelievable!


captainpecan

If you think I'm attacking you, I apologize.  It's quite obvious you are just looking for an argument with anyone and everyone here now.  That is nowhere near what I am trying to do.  It's just getting frustrating to see you arguing with everyone.  Then I saw you basically laughing at Ossie's work, simply because he shared his great work without following all your rules and measuring COP first.  We don't need you or anyone else trashing someone else's work because you don't agree with it.  I personally would love to see more work posted from all the builders, and this is exactly the kind of stuff that makes builders quit posting here.  I've wasted enough space on this forum with responding to this kind of crap.  So finish making yourself feel good, and throw another attack at me so I can ignore it then we'll all move on.  I used to hold a good deal of respect for the work you've put into this thread, but that's pretty much dwindled down to me just ignoring your posts.  Hell, you even eluded to John Bedini trying to suppress and hurt the free energy movement, simply because he does not agree with the orbo.  I just don't understand your motives anymore, but to be honest, I really don't care either.  I'll just do my best to ignore all your rants from here on out.

Pirate88179

Quote from: PaulLowrance on January 27, 2010, 07:26:16 PM
What a sad attack. I offer help and you attack me, lol. Very interesting. And don't tell me to get on track when it's people like you that are attacking and I'm the one talking about science. Yet one more time, the reason for the COP - efficiency measurements is so you people will know when there's an increase in excess energy. Geez, unbelievable!

Captainpecan is a well respected member of this forum and, I have never seen any evidence of him "attacking" anyone.  By the way, any "excess" in produced energy should make it able to self-run.  I use capacitors for this, supercaps to be exact.  It was Captanpecan that alerted me to this a long time ago. 

If you have X input and 3X coming out, it would stand to reason that a device should self-run.  You have "claimed" a COP > 1.  Where is your evidence?  Why have you not applied for the OU prize yet?

Bill
See the Joule thief Circuit Diagrams, etc. topic here:
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=6942.0;topicseen