STEORN DEMO LIVE & STREAM in Dublin, December 15th, 10 AM

[Omnibus]

How about this one: http://www.wpi.edu/Pubs/E-project/Available/E-project-042507-092653/unrestricted/MQP_D_1_2.pdf

[Omnibus]

Losses, losses ... How to avoid losses ... We discussed that with @Groundloop at one point but things ought to be tried out. Something simple as schematics is needed but that may not be so easy to achieve. A really skilled electronics designer is needed.

[bolt]

Losses, losses ... How to avoid losses ... We discussed that with @Groundloop at one point but things ought to be tried out. Something simple as schematics is needed but that may not be so easy to achieve. A really skilled electronics designer is needed.

OU starts with power savings that is true! Notice how joule thief is getting better as many people are looking at ways to save more energy in then surprised how many LEDS can be lit on a few mA's. Dr Stifler SEC is better though in many respects as its runs higher up RF so more energy per second extracted and its class C not class B.

They are both OU devices when properly made and understood.

[Omnibus]

OU starts with power savings that is true! Notice how joule thief is getting better as many people are looking at ways to save more energy in then surprised how many LEDS can be lit on a few mA's. Dr Stifler SEC is better though in many respects as its runs higher up RF so more energy per second extracted and its class C not class B.

They are both OU devices when properly made and understood.

OU has already been proven. So, that's beside the point. The goal now is the self-sustaining run. The losses I mentioned are the greatest obstacle to achieve such run. As a matter of fact that's the engineering problem with all OU devices, not only the electrical ones.

[exnihiloest]

OU has already been proven.

It did not.

The goal now is the self-sustaining run.
...

A self-sustaining run is the only proof of OU.