Mostly Permanent Magnet Motor with minimal Input Power

[SkyWatcher123]

Hi folks, Hi gotoluc, thanks for sharing your latest work, updates here, looks promising.
Also, look forward to seeing you floating around in your house boat, hehe.

So, 5 times greater force with the first coil compared to smaller model at same input.
Well, i have to say the name, Joseph Newman.
Though i feel Newmans motors are using multiple principles to achieve high efficiency in operation.
One of the main principles, is lots of copper atoms.
Though his in operation, delay line effect helps.
I wonder the weight of your first models coil compared to this super model, might be a ratio correlation.
One thing is a given, this design motor you have here luc, will outperform even the motors that are using both sides of a coil directly.
I forget the guys name who built that motor, but he gets double the shaft work compared to standard motor.
In my view, if we can get the same mileage at same average speed on an electric bicycle, car, etc. for half or even less input power, that actually means we can get 2-4 times the mileage at same average speed as the typical electric bicycle or car gets today on lead acid batts.
So say an econo electric bike gets 15-20 miles, we now get 30-40 or more for same charge.
You know folks, even Garry Stanleys dual magnet rotor, air core motor gave double the performance of standard electric bike motor based on his real road tests.
peace love light

[Magluvin]

It would be interesting to see if there is more initial pull with a bifi. I didnt understand the influence of the capacitance of a bifi back then as I do now.

Mags

[Magluvin]

Something that just came to mind. Thane wound his coils in a random fashion from what I was told. This would put a lot of empty space in the windings. So would he have been better off winding straight and tight? How much better? Better output than Z shows with increased resistance of adding all the existing 4 wires in series?  There may be more to this, considering the level of output change. 

Mags

[DaKrampus]

here is my 2 cents...just thinking out loud.. what if you think of the coil as a multilayerd coil, perfctly wound.. i might be wrong but i would think the output  would go up the closer it gets to a brooks coil shape and then down again.. or is my thinking totally wrong?
Luciano

[synchro1]

The relationship is very simple; Let's compare a coil of one loop to a coil of two loops and apply Ampere's and Ohm's laws. Given an equal amount of power, the magnetic strength doubles in the two loop coil along with the Ohmic resistance. Current is inversely proportional to Ohmic resistance: Therefore, we double the magnetic strength with the addition of the second loop, coupled with lower current draw! The addition of the second loop also adds a volt to the equation which lowers resistance and increases current, so the proportion is not linear but a factor of PI. That's why it takes four times the coil wraps to double the magnet throw for less current draw in Zeropoint123's video. So it's two steps forward and a partial step back.


Take this to it's logical extreme, and you can understand how Newman spins a 1/2 ton flywheel on voltage alone, with no current draw whatsoever! Newman's power coil is of gargantuan scale consisting of thin wire of many many turns to maximize this power ratio. His carnival motor has been COP>1 the entire time! Newman's COP is actually impossible to calculate bordering on infinity. Newman's oversized motor works identically to his miniature with a commutator like Lidmotor demonstrates. Nothing could be simpler! Lastly, just because Newman understands it doesn't mean he can explain it.