Gravity wheel of Mikhail Dmitriyev

[WilbyInebriated]

You say this because you want it to be so. But it isn't. Anybody may go back and read what I said about the differences. So yours is a genuine ad hominem. This a fact, yours is wishful thinking.

yeah let us see what you wrote...

On the other hand, characterizing someone as incompetent when he is trying to shoot down argument with incompetence is not ad hominem. That's a proper reaction in a discussion. It would be ad hominem if he was called incompetent but he actually isn't. That isn't the case in the discussion at hand.

so by your 'logic' and i am using that word in its loosest sense here... characterizing someone as a liar when they have lied is not ad hominem because that's the proper reaction in a discussion... as per the great omnibus.

[Omnibus]

LMFAO! you didn't list any! what is the post number where you listed these? or are you referring to your popper fallacy?

and let me make something overwhelmingly clear since you don't know me son, you and i are not friends, nor will we be. i despise people like you who eschew logic and reason.

Logic and reason is what is wanting in you, as is obvious from the exchange so far but I'm a gentleman enough to not despise you for those defficiencies of yours, although I don't know where their origin is, is it because of your very nature or because of the choppy education you were subjected to. Either way, it isn't pleasant to converse with a confused individual such as you but on the other hand it is nothing but noble to put an effort to straighten out confused thinking. That's how I feel and that's why I'm still continuing this exchange. Some readers may find it interesting too.

[WilbyInebriated]

HHMMMMmm.
We're bringing in the experts on this one.

But I think W has achieved OU. This Tag team will most definately go on Forever,and It seems that W can't control it,he's trying to engage
the heavies in the Cold electricity thread.

Could be a Runaway cascade event.............

Chetty

you got it wrong chetty, it's simply that i can hold off people like omni engaging in logical fallacies on multiple fronts and sometimes choose to do so. speaking of, you ever get around to that little exercise i laid out for you awhile back? your 'placebo logic'... remember? i do... 

[Omnibus]

yeah let us see what you wrote...so by your 'logic' and i am using that word in its loosest sense here... characterizing someone as a liar when they have lied is not ad hominem because that's the proper reaction in a discussion... as per the great omnibus.

When they lied yes, but when they didn't lie, as is the case, it is clear ad hominem. Confusion, confusion, that's what you're suffering from.

[WilbyInebriated]

Logic and reason is what is wanting in you, as is obvious from the exchange so far but I'm a gentleman enough to not despise you for those defficiencies of yours, although I don't know where their origin is, is it because of your very nature or because of the choppy education you were subjected to. Either way, it isn't pleasant to converse with a confused individual such as you but on the other hand it is nothing but noble to put an effort to straighten out confused thinking. That's how I feel and that's why I'm still continuing this exchange. Some readers may find it interesting too.

more fallacies from the master! imagine that! omni, you know nothing of my education... and again you engage in bifurcation or false dichotomy.