Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


One spoke vs. many spokes...

Started by iacob alex, December 30, 2009, 05:58:22 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

iacob alex


.....    in my opinion,seems to be,a questionable starting point,to imagine a possible PM.

         Why many spokes (wheel concept ), and no one spoke (lever,pendulum concept ),only?!

         A complete up-down (0*-180*) gravity fall ,of an eccentric mass/pendulum (pivot-rod-bob ),develops  into a smaller rise (180*-`330*),due to friction.

         Naturally,,the first idea,is to realize a full 360* rotation,to overcome this ~30* "difference",in some way...

        This is "the point" :to guess,figure "something" able to help a full 360* rotation...

           All the best! / Alex

iacob alex


    .....is a simple starting alternative,choice : a minimalist vs.  so many complicated,confused,conglomerate,twisted  prime lines,designs.

     Take a look at:   www.youtube.com/watch?v=riupxCOGDYk

     A patient attention can awake the wish to find out a new path of thinking...

                      All the best! / Alex
 

Low-Q

Well, that question has crossed my mind too. What is better with several spokes when one doesn't work? The answer is simple: As long the mechanism is limiting the weights within a given altitude, there will never be excess potential energy that can be converted to kinetic energy. Try wind-power- It definitely works, and are for free ;)

iacob alex


        Hi Low-Q !

  Your  simple,essential question is : "What is better with several spokes,when one doesn't work?".

  My spontaneous answer,is a question,also: "What can be better with minimum (two...) spokes ,when more spokes doesn't work ?".

  The real answer we can get from the facts/tests of reality...

  The topic "Lever vs. wheel" comments some details concerning this subject.

      All the best! / Alex

Low-Q

Well, I believe you understood my point, but two spokes versus more spokes should be a better way to say it. At least you can balance the wheel with at least two spokes. That means that IF it worked with several spokes, one spoke would also work. Of course the wheel would be jumping around as it rotates due to imbalance. So if one spoke does not work, it would definitely not work with several single non-working spokes on the same wheel...

Vidar