Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Experiments designing a BLDC Acyclical Generator

Started by leeanderthal, January 02, 2010, 07:55:06 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Magluvin

Leeanderthal
I had a setup that I was just trying that used a loop like that but used a rotor with mags. The difference with both compared to a homopolar motr/gen is that the magnet poles do not make any changes throughout the cycle on a traditional hp setup. As far as I know. So from what I see, you poles are kinda pulsing when rotating so it can generate due to that if the conductor is stationary and the mags move.

Magsmovin

phoneboy

The pic is halbach array.  The way the smaller magnets are aligned in the pic the field gets concentrated with both poles on the same side parallel with that plane with weak a field on the sides and back.  The idea is to rotate the smaller magnets causing the field to rotate, if you had coils wrapped around the stationary magnets the changing flux should cut the coils and generate without having to move the stationary magnets or the coils.

Magluvin

So how would the coils be posed? A window motor style? or lengthwise? If length then some would cancel, no?

Mags

Be back in about an hour

leeanderthal

What would be the best way to describe the failure of experiment #1?  Do we say that the field has inertia and remains stationary?  Does the field not even belong to the magnet?  I had heard magnets being described as a "room temperature gravity superconductor". Or something like that.
Will even the most minute distortion of the field in a ring magnet give the field traction when rotated axially? Such as a piece of steel mounted on the rim or a small cut in the rim or several?
I am going to do another experiment next week similar to the failed experiment #1.  Instead of using disk magnets, I will mount four arc magnets around an iron rod.  Four north poles out on one end and four south poles facing out on the other end.  Will the fact that these magnets have segments (and a certain amount of distortion) give the field enough traction to rotate with the assembly?
Sorry, I've got too many questions :D


phoneboy

You would just wrap the coils around the longer stationary magnets like it was a core.  I got the idea when I saw a thread a while back about a bloch wall generator, it seemed like a halbach array would be perfect for it.  I'm going to start building a motor/generator based on this soon but I plan on trying out different coil configs like series flat coils or rotated rodin eneagrams, with high permeability spacers in between.  I posted a pic in another thread (another way to fight lorenz) that might help to visualize better.