Global Warming Truth

[PaulLowrance]

so what warmed up the earth during that time?

I've already answered that. I agree with over 97% of active publishing climatologist that the significant cause of global warming is due to humanity from a wide range of effects from deforestation to CO2 emissions.

[silverfish]

Another recently "peer-reviewed" paper showing the conclusion that during the long Geological history of earth, there was no correlation between global temperature and atmospheric carbon dioxide levels.

http://www.friendsofscience.org/assets/files/documents/debate.pdf

So Paul is wrong; and his statement that 97% of active publishing climatologist believe humanity is a significant cause of global warming is based off of only 79 people on the whole planet. I dealt with this already starting here:

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=8608.msg222865#msg222865

Paul is a deceiver, giving the impression that the over 97% is a large group of people. It is not.

The major link between Carbon Dioxide levels in the atmosphere and global warming is shown to be that Carbon Dioxide levels increase AFTER the average global temperature rises. This is a result of the solar activity warming the atmosphere and the solubility of Carbon Dioxide in the oceans going down due to warming. This is what is shown to raise the Carbon Dioxide levels.

Obviously this will go on and on because Paul refuses to believe that the sun warms the atmosphere and the physics of carbon dioxide solubility shows that as the temperature rises the solubility of Carbon Dioxide gas in water decreases, thus releasing more Carbon Dioxide into the atmosphere.

That's right, carbon dioxide increase _follows_ global warming, not preceding it - and the sun warms the planet - just as it has always done for thousands of years. The idea that human-caused C02 is responsible for global warming, when the planet has been cooling for the past 9 years, is being exposed as false, even in the controlled mainstream media. The scientific data on which warming is based is shown to be manipulated - repeatedly. The scientists responsible are recipients of large grants or business interests prompting them to reinforce  the perception of global warming where none exists. NASA GISS, IPCC, The Met Office in the UK, the East Anglian Climate Research Unit - all of these organizations are being exposed for their bias and their culpability, and, no doubt, more corruption will be revealed as the 'can of climate worms' opens wider.
     Here's more on NASA global warming alarmist Dr. James Hansen, who calls for the destruction of industrial civilisation and population reduction measures to prevent 'climate change'.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/nasa-global-warming-alarmist-endorses-book-that-calls-for-mass-genocide.html

Read 'Ecoscience' by Science Czar John Holdren to get his views on forced abortion, drugging of the water supply and all the rest of it.

[Azorus]

Yes pual i am glad you agree with 1/39 of the scientific population on climate change, that agreed to “In our survey, the most specialized and knowledgeable respondents (with regard to climate change) are those who listed climate science as their area of expertise and who also have published more than 50% of their recent peer-reviewed papers on the subject of climate change (79 individuals in total). Of these specialists, 96.2% (76 of 79) answered “risen” to question 1 and 97.4% (75 of 77) answered yes to question
2.”

here is your cookie.  No you did not answer what warmed the earth prior to 1900
No it is not a great survey when only 30% respond, and only 1/39th answer your two proud questions.

BTW over 3100 scientist where questioned, not just 79.

let me correct that over 10,000 where petitioned.  only 3194 responded, of which only 79 answered those two questions that where deemed qualified.

So the others that answered the question with masters, and doctorits that answered the question didn't matter?

[PaulLowrance]

Yes pual

First of all, I have no interest in someone who acts like a immature child. My name is clearly spelled "Paul."  You're harming yourself, not me.

i am glad you agree with 1/39 of the scientific population on climate change, that agreed to “In our survey, the most specialized and knowledgeable respondents (with regard to climate change) are those who listed climate science as their area of expertise and who also have published more than 50% of their recent peer-reviewed papers on the subject of climate change (79 individuals in total). Of these specialists, 96.2% (76 of 79) answered “risen” to question 1 and 97.4% (75 of 77) answered yes to question
2.”

here is your cookie.  No you did not answer what warmed the earth prior to 1900
No it is not a great survey when only 30% respond, and only 1/39th answer your two proud questions.

BTW over 3100 scientist where questioned, not just 79.

let me correct that over 10,000 where petitioned.  only 3194 responded, of which only 79 answered those two questions that where deemed qualified.

So the others that answered the question with masters, and doctorits that answered the question didn't matter?

Furthermore, your understanding of science and statistics seems limited. The survey was done by scientists at the University of Illinois. For anyone interested, here's the pdf -->

http://tigger.uic.edu/~pdoran/012009_Doran_final.pdf


Again, I agree with over 97% of active publishing climatologist.

[Cap-Z-ro]

*checks to see if Paul is watching*