Global Warming Truth

[PaulLowrance]

This thread was started only for peer reviewed references, such as found at wikipedia. Please not claims without such references.


Quote,

"Over 97% of actively publishing climate scientists agree that human activity such as fossil fuel burning and deforestation is a significant contributing factor to global climate change[1]"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Climate_change_consensus

The reference is at the wikipedia page. What makes WikiPedia so special is that they require legitimate references.


For further details see my blog -->

http://globalfreeenergy.info/2010/01/07/global-warming-truth/

[Tink]

Weren't the poles melting on Mars?
Must sure have been fossil fuel burning and deforestation.

[PaulLowrance]

BTW, this thread was started only for peer reviewed references, such as found at wikipedia. Please no claims without such references.

Weren't the poles melting on Mars?
Must sure have been fossil fuel burning and deforestation.

Hi. Could please show a peer reviewed reference.

[silverfish]

BTW, this thread was started only for peer reviewed references, such as found at wikipedia. Please no claims without such references.


Hi. Could please show a peer reviewed reference.

I don't need a peer reviewed reference to look out of the window to see a great deal of snow and ice. Here in the UK possibly the coldest winter for 100 years is upon us. In County Durham there are photos of people posing beneath 20-25 foot icicles. Perhaps this is due to global warming, but perhaps the moon is made of cheese, and we just don't see it yet. Perhaps we need a peer review, then we can see it.
       The editors leaving Wikipedia in droves, in the wake of the recent scandal concerning peer review, the biased information editing, and the exclusion of contributors who did not fit the informational paradigm, were subject to peer review. These learned gentlemen failed the test. I am happy to fail the test also because I have not provided peer-reviewed references. The fact I am a real human being with intelligence and undamaged perception that can see, not only the major freeze occurring globally right now, but also through the total fraud of 'global warming' and those pushing it who are poised through their companies to net massive profits - I can see through the corrupted peer review process itself and how it has been hijacked by special interests, just like our wonderful mainstream media, that has been constantly telling us that the planet is heating up, it's our fault, and we must be taxed into oblivion because of... an increasingly discredited, isolated, transparent scientific fraud, Anthropogenic Global Warming.
     I don't need a peer review to wake up. I don't need a peer review to open my eyes - and I don't need a peer review to tell me how to think. I can do that for myself.
       

[PaulLowrance]

I don't need a peer reviewed reference to look out of the window to see a great deal of snow and ice. Here in the UK possibly the coldest winter for 100 years is upon us. In County Durham there are photos of people posing beneath 20-25 foot icicles. Perhaps this is due to global warming, but perhaps the moon is made of cheese, and we just don't see it yet. Perhaps we need a peer review, then we can see it.
       The editors leaving Wikipedia in droves, in the wake of the recent scandal concerning peer review, the biased information editing, and the exclusion of contributors who did not fit the informational paradigm, were subject to peer review. These learned gentlemen failed the test. I am happy to fail the test also because I have not provided peer-reviewed references. The fact I am a real human being with intelligence and undamaged perception that can see, not only the major freeze occurring globally right now, but also through the total fraud of 'global warming' and those pushing it who are poised through their companies to net massive profits - I can see through the corrupted peer review process itself and how it has been hijacked by special interests, just like our wonderful mainstream media, that has been constantly telling us that the planet is heating up, it's our fault, and we must be taxed into oblivion because of... an increasingly discredited, isolated, transparent scientific fraud, Anthropogenic Global Warming.
     I don't need a peer review to wake up. I don't need a peer review to open my eyes - and I don't need a peer review to tell me how to think. I can do that for myself.
     

You did not read it. It is considered very bad science to try and arrive at the global warming trend from a few years average. The reason is due to the global temperature fluctuations over time. An average of at least a decade is required.

If scientists used your method of taking a few years average they could point out dozens of times throughout the past century where there was global cooling, global warming, global cooling, global warming. Fortunately that is bad science and nearly 100% of climatologist do not practice bad science. That is why nearly 100.00% of active publishing climatologist believe global warming is real, and why over 97% of such climatologist believe humanity is a significant caused of global warming.

As for the rest of your post, sorry, I'm not interested in science based on claims & hand waving, and neither are nearly 100% of active publishing climatologist. Next time please read before making accusations, as I've address all of your concerns in my blog post.


Again, please do not reply unless you have peer reviewed data. No scientists is interested in claims without data.