Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Magnet motor in Argentina

Started by Jdo300, March 19, 2006, 12:46:30 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

treb79

QuoteWhat would happen is, there would be 2-4 stators ALWAYS LIFTED at their maximum height wtih no other stators lifted, so the 'loop' is broken.

Then one of the stators would go down and one would come up to this maximum position, and it is at this time that there 'might' be a 'loop' situation, BUT what happens in a loop situation?? The rotor is TORQUE-LESS, BUT it isn't MOMENTUM-LESS! So the enormous torque on the rotor would easily guide it through IF there was a momentous 'loop' situation, which I don't think will occur.

OR (the prefered condition) etc. etc.


why don't you femm the whole thing as I suggested? Apart from building the thing and extensively testing different configurations, anything else is pure guess work.

treb79

actually, I don't see an awful lot of difference between sliding a stator magnet in and out as in Torbay's patent drawing(2d), and lifting a magnet up and down(3d).  :) just try it with some real magnets. or model a row of magnets in either configuration to see what the differences are, if any. That can be done in 2d.

treb79

just try it and see  ;)  ;)  :D  ;D

Duranza

This thing works better when the stator magnets are on hinges moving up and down rather than taking it out. It takes less force to push it up than to pull it out. I got a small prototype built with 1/8 sq. neos and it almost want's to work. I don't have the rotor cap made yet but when i push down on a magnet it makes it rotate like 30-45 degrees. I'm on the quest of getting a video camera so i can post video of it.
The only way to Validate is to Replicate!

treb79

Great, at last, someone with some real results. Excellent.  :) Looking forward to see your video.

actually, it does take less effort to move the stator magnets up and down the same distance as if you were moving them in and out. But you  have to move them in and out a smaller distance to obtain the same effect on the rotor.  It can be modelled in 2d, just move out the stator magnets less than if you were moving them up and down.