All of Stanley Meyer's Equipment FOUND Including Dune Buggy! (Videos Here)

[MarkE]

One reason that so few have succeeded in duplicating
Meyer's work is that Meyer himself didn't fully understand
what was happening and couldn't positively isolate the
critical pulse characteristics.  State of the art devices
and technology have improved considerably since the
time Stan was developing the driver circuits.

"So few", is a total of zero proven cases to date.

His pulsing devices, for the most part, utilized Bipolar
Transistors which have certain drawbacks.  Today it is
possible to use MOSFETs with high speed drivers to
better generate the necessary pulses.

Bipolar devices, properly driven are faster than MOS devices.  The huge advantage of MOS devices is the high power gains that they afford compared to pure bipolar.

So what is the "secret?"  Very sharp pulses of an optimal
pulse width at an optimum frequency modulated at an
optimum rate into bursts of the optimum number of pulses
with an optimal rest period between bursts.

The amplitude of the pulses should also be adjustable in
order to determine the most efficient peak voltage.

Those who have adequate knowledge of electronic circuits
and devices should rather easily be able to devise a circuit
with suitable adjustments to accomplish that task.

If this is in fact so then someone should be able to demonstrate that the claim is true.

Begin tests with a simple cell consisting of just two electrodes
and spend the needed time patiently searching for results.

Once the phenomenon is observed and carefully evaluated
it may be possible to devise control circuitry to automatically
'scan and lock.'  One of Meyer's circuits was designed to do
just that.

Do not rely on Meyer's circuits to produce the best results,
however.  Be creative and improve upon his designs since
they were sometimes unreliable and difficult to adjust.

Examine the materials that Les Banki has generously provided.

If you really want it, go get it.  As inexpensively as possible.
Simplicity is key.

Chessnyt,

Your analysis above is right on the mark!

One might take note of whose statements conform to the truth over time and whose do not.  One might take note of who relies on demonizing those they disagree with and who does not.  There is nothing wrong with speculative ideas, even wildly speculative ideas.  Evidence drives what we understand and separates it from our fancies.

[magpwr]

hi MarkE,

Previously i spoke of a inventor in India whom conditioned cell to get some oxide coating on tube to improve efficiency to exceed Faraday.The only person whom came close to Stanley Meyer's.

This time i shall show you this commercial video seen in gizmodo using nickel oxide to achieve the same feat.For demo they are just using 1xAAA to get Hydrogen from water.

http://gizmodo.com/scientists-pulled-hydrogen-from-water-using-an-aaa-batt-1625507145

Still living in the dark?

[tinman]

The moth tenis is your own fault. You are acusing others but you are a player too in all this man. If you're sick and tired of the thread, get out!  Or do you have no life to speak of and you are what you acuse others of. I do not see the guy asking for money or tryn to pul a scam so what is your excuse to play into this when you are just what you claim him to be.  Go yread your hypocite book and get lost.

What i do peanut,is post actual build's,with actual result's.I write and comment on what i see,and i see a whole lot of talk(and dribble from people like your self)and no action. You make a claim,you put forth your evidence,not just pollywaffle on and on. Im guessing you are board,and just had to throw in your two cent's worth,while i base my statements on experiments done-yes,my own HHO experiments.

So go take your nap now,unless of course you can show an over faraday HHO system-bet ya cant,but that is no supprise.

[MarkE]

hi MarkE,

Previously i spoke of a inventor in India whom conditioned cell to get some oxide coating on tube to improve efficiency to exceed Faraday.The only person whom came close to Stanley Meyer's.

This time i shall show you this commercial video seen in gizmodo using nickel oxide to achieve the same feat.For demo they are just using 1xAAA to get Hydrogen from water.

http://gizmodo.com/scientists-pulled-hydrogen-from-water-using-an-aaa-batt-1625507145

Still living in the dark?

magpwr the Stanford innovation is not being able to electrolyze water with 1.5V potential.  That is already well established art.  Ideally, 1.23V is all that is required and one can get there or very, very close with expensive anode and cathode materials.  The Stanford  innovation is electrolyzing water at 1.5V with much cheaper anode and cathode materials than others have previously used. 

[tinman]

magpwr the Stanford innovation is not being able to electrolyze water with 1.5V potential.  That is already well established art.  Ideally, 1.23V is all that is required and one can get there or very, very close with expensive anode and cathode materials.  The Stanford  innovation is electrolyzing water at 1.5V with much cheaper anode and cathode materials than others have previously used.

@ Mark
I have never seen any benefit at all in all my HHO testing,that shows that 1.5 volt's is the optimal voltage-or any low voltage for that matter,for producing HHO. It always add's up to being the same watt's input,for tha same amount of gas produced by the same cell. If we go heavy on the Elite,and use a low voltage,we may get X amount of gas production per watt. If we go lite on the Elite,and use a higher voltage,we still get X amount of HHO per watt. I have never seen any benefit for using low voltage. I also built the Dave Lawton circuit,and tested that with my 7 tube cell,and after days of tuning and trying all mannor of frequencies and pulse width's,i managed to get my cells to ring in resonance. Even then,i got a better output from the same cell using the same amount of power on a straight DC current. Lawton's circuit has since been used for part's-a big waste of time. I then spent many hours and dollars building the altinator setup,and did get better results with that one-infact it was the closest i got to faraday with any of my setups-even better than my eleven plate dry cell. 2.62 watt hours for 1LTR of HHO was my best yet. Looking back on my note's,i ran the cell so as each tube had 5.5 volt's across them,and used KOH as the Elite.