All of Stanley Meyer's Equipment FOUND Including Dune Buggy! (Videos Here)

[wattsup]

@sparks

So you're back. hehehehehe

Where the hell have you been man.

I see you have not lost your touch. Always around to link relationships of effects.

Regarding the production of hydrogen via water, knowing what I know today, I am sure there is no bond breaking in the electrolysis process. The process does not effect the bonds, like microwave does not heat the plate, only the food. What it really does is it pulls on the nuclei of each atom and rips the bonds apart.

You see, in order for the hydrogen to remain as hydrogen once split apart, those bonds need to be intact otherwise you no longer have hydrogen but just produced another element, since the element is the total of nucleus plus bonds (what we today call electrons - bull but let's play the game by standard rules - hehehe). If you take this as a potential explanation, there might be an easy way to test this.

Just use one anode and cathode and set them as close together as possible. Run the system and see how much hydrogen is being produced. Then stop the system and add two Neo magnets, one on each side of the anode/cathode
with opposing polarities facing each other but with a spacer between to hold them apart. The Neos will add to the pull force of the pulsed anode/cathode and should this produce more hydrogen, this may be an indicator that the bonds (which should not be influenced by any pulsing energy) are not what is being pulled on but it is the nucleus that gets pulled away, thus pulling away the whole Atom. You may have to switch the polarities of the magnets as a third test to see if this also has any effect.

Anyways,  just wanted to say hi.

wattsup

[Cap-Z-ro]

Hey you schrodinger's cat newbie. I only have 20 posts and I agree with you. We do not need ad-hominem attacks regardless of amount of posts. Hold on I gotta check on my cat he's been sick lately.

Well, what a surprise, yet another 'official 9/11 lie' supporter, and also another new account.

Coincidence ?

Or, yet another shill to replace the one I already burned up.

Again, the latter wood be the case.

Regards...

[orbut 3000]

I find this 'shill' accusation based on post count a bit inconsistent because one can be accused to be a 'shill' based on a high post count as well as on a low post count.

[SeaMonkey]

Every 'Troll' has a beginning and does start his/her
career with a post count of '1.'  It has always been
post content which establishes the identity of any
Troll.  Some are more adept, more skillful, more
creative than others.  Some are downright
entertaining.  The internet has brought us many
very positive advancements and a less positive
multiplication of the Troll population.  It is human
nature - whenever a group of people are engaged
in conversation it becomes a powerful magnet for
any prospective Troll who finds the situation
impossible to ignore.

In the meantime progress continues with the
discovery that Stan Meyer made in peaceful
quietude far removed from any distracting
drama.

To call it "Meyer Technology" is perhaps a
misnomer;  Stan never did reveal the essential
details of the process in any of his writings,
presentations or patents, most likely because
he did not fully understand what was taking place.

That those details are lacking from his patents
is not uncommon; many patents convey the
general nature of the device without revealing
essential details.  Unfortunately, too many
experimenters have missed the essence in trying
to duplicate what Stan described as he described
it.

[MarkE]

That's yet another appeal to supposed magic hidden behind a curtain.