Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[XS-NRG]

FINALLY!! 

Will the Clown soap end or ?
What do you think?

[chrisC]

...
If the test turns out its a load of crap then job done - move on!..

You don't need a professor to tell you it's a load of crap. People with basic understanding of electronics and physics already know this is delusional crap.

cheers
chrisC

[Charlieb000]

~

there are some inventions that are worthy of investigation, physicsprof,
one of my favorite examples is the two stage oscillator, look for 'video 6' on youtube, the OU is obvious (but the frequency is not useful for me, a pump. i prefer solid state) and had you seen Patrick kellys book?

as for this transformer (topic), i believe the output of this transformer is actually like NMR except its with electrons  (as thats whats magnetic in metals), like Electron-paramagnetic-resonance (EPR) or electron-spin-resonance (ESR). the resonant freq depends on magnetic field and the more intense, the higher the freq. the pulse is placed in might be returnable from EMF.  but havnt done any EPR myself and i am not the tinker sort of guy, it has to work first time (or so) and i wont start unless i know everything.

there are a few devices in Kelley's book that might work on simular principals, like the Iron bar that has three coils on it and the magnet block with three coils on it... with the magnet (i believe), one coil is to mess up the magnet field so there are weak spots so 60hz would work.

i prefer to start a project that i know will work and will stay working... sometimes you can find simularites between devices and get a better picture on how they would work. for example graeme gundersons device works simular to the MEG, GG says the magnets can wear out (something you didnt know about the MEG?) i think its because of the Lenz in the generating coils repelling the magnet flux.




cb.

[Charlieb000]

.... real determined people have left the forum and set up on their own smaller dedicated forums elsewhere....

is there any list of these forums?

[SchubertReijiMaigo]

i prefer to start a project that i know will work and will stay working... sometimes you can find simularites between devices and get a better picture on how they would work. for example graeme gundersons device works simular to the MEG, GG says the magnets can wear out (something you didnt know about the MEG?) i think its because of the Lenz in the generating coils repelling the magnet flux.

I have noticed that also, Resonance is a common part in FE devices but request a lot of tuning and knowledge about this, like a Radio Amator or a Tesla-Coiler...

Magnet pulsed and embedded in a core (or two C cores) seems a good solution, check Kunel patent for this, the lenz law apply to the magnet (physically) not to the control coil, in fact this is the same like moving the magnet physically, like a conventional generator. More you load, more you have some "Lorentz force" on your magnet, the magnet is pushed away, this why the magnet vibrate and must be glued (or better solidly embedded in a core.) --> a similarity with the TPU and it's gyroscopic/gravitational/vibrational anomaly !?

Maybe also replace the magnet by a DC bias coil (you can heavily saturate a core with a few watts) pulse it in reverse direction and collect the induced EMF... --> it looks like the pulsed bucking coils in reverse direction and create a so called "parametric transformer". I see a lot of resemblance about the theory and FE devices --> resonance, high Q, pulsed magnets or magnetics fields, power factor, tuning, etc...

Here with the Fleet devices I 'am very sceptic why ? Because of the large risk of measurement error: this is very difficult to measure distorded square wave, and the milliwatts range add nothing better... I prefer large scale overunity in watts range or even in the hundreds whatts range, and straight DC or beautiful sine waves measurement, and the guys know something about Power Factor measurement... (Reactive power vs Real power)...