Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[powercat]

    
http://www.britishpathe.com/record.php?id=1869

[ltseung888]

As far as my resonating audio transformer experiment goes,
I will try to put a summary together when I get my workbench up and running.
Jist is... when you resonate a typical Transformer, by however means, it
bursts with energy.

My best idea for you is this...
Why? For one, it is an easy way to light a CFL from your current setup.

1. Buy an Ignition Coil from the Auto Store.
2. Use a Signal Generator and an O-Scope to determine it's Resonant
Frequency.
3. Use an O-Scope to design/tune your Best Joule Thief to the Resonant
Frequency of the Ignition Coil.
4. Hook up output of the JT... to Input of the Ignition Coil. & fine tune to
resonance.
5. Measure output of Ignition Coil, and see if it lights a CFL for the better
part of a day (1.5 V battery).

Dear Observer,

It looks like Aaron in Hong Kong already understood your technique.  He used something similar to light up his Christmas tree.  Instead of resonating an ignition coil, he resonated the toroid.

The details will come out when he shows his Christmas tree next month.

Your suggestion is extremely valuable.  Using resonance or near resonance conditions to bring-in external energy is definitely the right direction to take.

Keep up the brilliant thinking and work.

Lawrence

[ltseung888]

Meeting with Prof. T at the Senior Center in Irvine, California

Prof. T: “Hello, Mr. Tseung.  I am a retired professor in Physics.  I heard about the lead-out or bring-in energy theory from my students.  They told me that you go to the Senior Center on Fridays.  Nice meeting you.”

Tseung: “We can take a walk outside and talk under the blue sky.  My daughter drops me off in the morning and will pick me up in the evening.  I have at least 5 hours to spend here.  I can watch movies, play table tennis, take walks or join the dancing lessons.  Talking about lead-out energy tops them all.”

Prof. T: “I want to focus on your lead-out or bring-in energy theory.  I designed one of the street cleaning water jets that is used to clean the streets.  Your explanation of the water toy gun and the one-way valve pump was of great interest to me.  I used air+water in my jet.  I found that an air+water jet is much more powerful than a water jet alone.”

Tseung: “Do you agree with my assumption that air is an energy carrier?”

Prof. T: “Your formula of Energy of Air In (Ein) = Volume In x Pressure In is correct.  If we do a dimensional analysis on both sides of the equation, we can see that they correspond.  Your biggest contribution is the assumption that Ein can be greater than Eout.  The difference is the lead-out or bring-in energy from still ar.”

Tseung: ‘Thank you.”

Prof. T: “Once I accepted that energy from the surrounding can be brought-in, the rest of your theory is straight forward.  Even though I designed the air+water jet, I did not take into account the (Ein-Eout) term.  I knew that my air+water jet was more powerful, used much less energy and cleaned the street much better than a pure water jet.”

Tseung: “Did you look into the pulsed pendulum?”

Prof. T: “I shall look into that in detail next.  You said that you have a pendulum toy that could demonstrate this part of the theory.  Can you bring it in next time?”

Tseung: ‘I shall be glad to.”

It looks like the Almighty is working miracles.  He managed to find a retired Physics Professor interest in the Micky Mouse pendulum toy!

[allcanadian]

@The Observer

My claim, for those just joining, is that 2 tuning forks ring louder and longer than 1.

Here is the reason your tuning forks and my dual pendulum experiment will stay in motion much longer -- Pd=1/2*p*V^3*A*Cd. This is the equation for Drag which describes the fact that drag increases as the cube of the velocity. When two tuning forks are in oscillation and are proximate to one another standing pressure waves evolve between them which reduces the drag forces. If the air between the forks is moving at velocity A and the forks at velocity B and if these motions act in the same direction in time then the apparent air velocity the forks percieve approaches zero relative to the local air velocity which is zero.
I find is hard to believe so many people would have such a problem with basic high school physics and this should be no harder to understand than the fact that if you are running at 10mph with a 10mph tailwind then the air around you has an apparent velocity of zero, that is it appears stationary dispite the fact that the local velocity is in fact 10mph.
With my dual pendulum energy as motion is transferred from one pendulum to the other alternately through the cross beam which oscillates on the beat note or difference in velocity between the pendulums. As well the bearing friction of each pendulum must result in a turning moment on the cross beam -- a simple lever action. While the surface area of the dual pendulums has increased a great deal relative to a single pendulum the fact remains that more elements are moving in resonance so the average velocity must decrease. If the surface area has doubled but the average velocity has halved them the system will experience four times less drag due to the velocity cubed rule which is the reason it remains in motion much longer. My dual pendulum may appear to move more but appearances are not facts, the fact is that a small change in velocity can produce a great change in the reduction in the drag forces.
I should also mention the fact that this is part of the reason why Nikola Tesla could transfer huge amounts of energy from one system to another with essentially no losses, one wire conduction and the wireless transfer of energy .
Regards
AC

[ltseung888]

Email exchanges with Prof. T

From Prof. T:

Mr. Tseung, I enjoyed the discussion with you yesterday.  You do have some interesting thoughts that are not accepted by the traditional scientists yet.  Science is not a sacred castle.  No true scientist will claim that he has mastered all the secrets of the universe.  No true scientist will claim that there are Laws that cannot be broken.  With new advances in technology and new discoveries, a true scientist must be prepared to re-examine the established concepts.

I congratulate you on discovering and promoting the new concept of lead-out or bring-in of energy from the surrounding environment.  I can see that this concept does not violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.  If you can continuously bring in energy from the environment to power your machine, your machine can run forever.  In that sense, a windmill is a bring-in energy machine.  It brings-in the moving wind energy to do useful work.

You have expanded that concept to the water gun, the one-way valve pump and my air+water street cleaning jet.  You also mentioned (which I have not seriously investigated) the pulsed pendulum, the pulsed magnetic wheels and the pulsed transformer.

One thing that troubled me was your explanation of resonance.  I and my colleagues always thought that resonance is just a very efficient state of absorbing the pulsing energy.    The amplitude of oscillation increases rapidly as the pulsing energy is added to the system.  Your mentioning that the same pulsing energy away from the resonance frequency should be the same as that at or near the resonance frequency troubled me.

Can you outline your thoughts in greater detail?

See you at the Senior Center in two weeks time.

My email reply:

Dear Prof. T,

I enjoyed the discussion very much.  That was the first time in USA that I could discuss the subject with someone well qualified.

My concept of resonance is as follows:

1.   If you push a child on a swing, you must push at the right time in order for the swing to go higher.  You are providing the pulsing energy.  At the same time, the tension on the ropes of the swing will bring-in gravitational energy.  (We can discuss this more when we meet next time).
2.   Approximately one part of gravitational energy will be brought-in with two parts of your pushing energy.  (We can go through the mathematics when we meet).  Thus three parts of energy enters the swing system.
3.   If there were no energy loss, the coefficient of performance (Output/Input energy) is 1.5.  The extra 0.5 is the lead-out energy.
4.   If we have perfect feedback, the first push from you is 1 unit.  When the swing comes back to you, the energy is already 1.5 units.  You will give it another push of 1 unit.  The energy is thus 2.5 units.  This 2.5 units will be multiplied by 1.5 because COP is 1.5.  This means the energy coming back to you will be 3.75 (2.5 x 1.5).
5.   If we repeat the calculation as in 4, we shall find that the energy of the system increases rapidly in an exponential fashion.  This agrees with the observation and definition of resonance in Physics.
6.   If the system is not perfect (feedback not too efficient) and there were some losses of energy, we can still observe a large increase in amplitude at resonance.  If the pulsing frequency is not the resonance frequency, it is equivalent to pushing the swing at the wrong time.  The swing will stop or slow down quickly.
7.   To summarize, I believe the swing, the pendulum, the tuning fork, the LCR resonance circuits all involve bring-in energy.  If the pulsing frequency is correct (the resonance frequency), the sum of the pulsing energy and the bring-in energy must be higher than the pulsing energy alone.
8.   If we have the correct feedback mechanism and low loss, we may be able to produce the bring-in energy machine that will continuous feedback itself after starting and have enough extra energy to do useful work. 
9.   Such a bring-in energy machine is not the impossible perpetual motion energy machine because we have a continuous supply of energy from the surrounding environment.
10.   Providing the pulse at the correct frequency (resonance) is an important factor in such a machine.

In the case of the two or more tuning fork experiment, I believe that the sound from two or more tuning forks is louder than when only one is hit â€" is due to the bring-in energy from air into the two or more tuning fork environment.  Law of Conservation of energy is still valid.

Hope the above clarifies the resonance discussion.  The rapid increase in amplitude of oscillation at resonance is due to the addition of bring-in energy. This addition will not happen at other frequencies.