Amazing!!!..Quality of Life Restored

[4Tesla]

Here is my suggestion:

Step 1:    Wand a beliver with an ordinary pen. Then, ask the beliver if he/she feels anything.

Step 2:    Wand a non-believer with both real wand and ordinary pen. Then, ask the non-beliver if he/she feels any difference.

By the way, I learnt this "clever test" from here:

http://www.scam.com/showthread.php?t=126022

I plan on testing the placebo effect theory.. I am going to use a fake wand (a telescopic antenna) and the "real" wand and say that they both work.. I'll see what happens.

4Tesla

[jacek]

Went to Amega presentations twice: a few weeks ago and tonight.

During the first presentation, I sampled the wanded and unwanded wine (with Amega wand). Could tell the difference in taste. Did not get wanded on that night.

Tonight, I tasted the lemon slice, wanded vs. unwanded. There was no difference in taste.
Then I volunteered for wanding my hands (a bit of a pain in both). Two Amega people worked on my hands for about 10-15 minutes total. Again, no difference.

Not sure what to make of this, I wanted to feel the difference, there were people in the audience who claimed their pain levels had subsided, but nothing for me, zip.
 

[Cap-Z-ro]

Dumb quote:

" Folks, During the last 24 hours, two messages have been deleted for no reasons. One of the messages was from Tito L. Oracion, who has said nothing negative in his message. I suggest, when you respond to this thread, make sure you make a copy of your message. If possible,  make sure you quote the important message your response. "



I would suggest that all stupid non productive unqualified negative rantings be copied into a word file, so that they can be read whenever a negative mood is desired.

That way the rest of us won't be subjected to them.

You will note the negative results reported above were not deleted.

THATS BECAUSE IT WAS AN ACTUAL EXPERIENCE...NOT MINDLESS NEGATIVE SELF ABSORBED CRAP.

Regards...

[Trino Cularoid]

I guess somewhat careless reading might make a posting appear to be negative even though it isn't per se...

[Context: If you're not doing a double-blind study you most likely have to be dishonest to a degree (e.g. you knowingly use deceiving suggestions that the other party misinterprets, something some could call "lying"). But what is mainly being tested in this case? The function of a product, or rather the placebo effect, or the ability of a person to convince somebody of something?]

[skcusitrah]

@ 4tesla, cap-z-ro,

Might there be an update? I am interested in your findings. My own with the "nano wand" have been positive.